2017
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of adult unrelated donor products in hematopoietic cell transplantation: the OneMatch experience and systematic review of the literature

Abstract: Future studies with standard outcome measures are needed to clarify the impact of cryopreservation on engraftment and other transplant outcomes. International guidelines that consider the ethical framework surrounding requests for donor product cryopreservation are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to the recommendations from national and international bodies, the majority of products collected from unrelated donors have been cryopreserved (68% of products collected from Canadian donors from March 2020 to June 2021) before infusion in comparison to 4% in the 12 months before the pandemic and approximately 7% noted in a historical cohort that was previously described [ 11 ]. With regard to adverse events related to cryopreservation, none of eight adverse event reports that were filed by CBS to the World Marrow Donor Association between January 2019 and March 2020 was related to cryopreservation, whereas between March 2020 and June 2021, a total of four adverse events were reported, all of which described impacts related to cryopreservation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the recommendations from national and international bodies, the majority of products collected from unrelated donors have been cryopreserved (68% of products collected from Canadian donors from March 2020 to June 2021) before infusion in comparison to 4% in the 12 months before the pandemic and approximately 7% noted in a historical cohort that was previously described [ 11 ]. With regard to adverse events related to cryopreservation, none of eight adverse event reports that were filed by CBS to the World Marrow Donor Association between January 2019 and March 2020 was related to cryopreservation, whereas between March 2020 and June 2021, a total of four adverse events were reported, all of which described impacts related to cryopreservation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncultured HPCs and MNCs withstand cryopreservation relatively well. [21][22][23][24][25][26] However, cultured or gene manipulated cells and certain cell subtypes such as monocytes and NK cells are less resilient and experience phenotypic alterations postthaw. [27][28][29][30] Some loss of cell viability and function is inevitable with cryopreservation.…”
Section: Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncultured HPCs and MNCs withstand cryopreservation relatively well . However, cultured or gene manipulated cells and certain cell subtypes such as monocytes and NK cells are less resilient and experience phenotypic alterations postthaw .…”
Section: Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autologous PBMNC starting material is also often cryopreserved to allow for flexibility in scheduling manufacturing. 6 While hematopoietic stem cells survive cryopreservation and thawing well, and cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been performed for many years, 7,8 the effects of the cryopreservation on cultured T cells is less certain. The data available suggest that the overall recovery of cryo-thawed T cells is marginally worse than that of hematopoietic stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%