Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic Female Choice and Other Types of Post-copulatory Sexual Selection

Abstract: This chapter discusses sexual selection by cryptic female choice (CFC) and other possible types of selection on traits involved in male-female interactions during and following copulation. Morphological, behavioral, and probably also physiological traits all show the typical earmarks of sexual selection: puzzlingly extravagant, apparently non-utilitarian design; and rapid divergent evolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
287
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
10
287
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistent use of cadherin hetero-allelic sperm by females found here supports the hypothesis that differential sperm retention or displacement was mediated by male × female interactions (Eberhard, 1996; Simmons, 2001). Genetically based male × female interactions are important determinants of paternity success in mice, fruit flies and beetles (Pitnick et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consistent use of cadherin hetero-allelic sperm by females found here supports the hypothesis that differential sperm retention or displacement was mediated by male × female interactions (Eberhard, 1996; Simmons, 2001). Genetically based male × female interactions are important determinants of paternity success in mice, fruit flies and beetles (Pitnick et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In most insect species, females mate multiply with several males and competition between ejaculates and cryptic female choice of sires is widespread (Eberhard 1996; Simmons, 2001). Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed the potential impacts of Bt resistance on sperm competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A female may also benefit by influencing sperm use patterns (Eberhard 1996). This phenomenon may be mediated by female-derived molecules.…”
Section: Do Sfps Contribute To Postmating Sexual Conflict?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darwin's definition of sexual selection is very similar to the more modern definition of pre-copulatory sexual selection in animals (Andersson 1994; Jones and Ratterman 2009). However, along with the application of this theory to more taxa (hermaphrodite species, plants) and post-copulatory stages of the life cycle, the definition has been extended to include sexual reproductive functions (rather than sexes) and competition over fertilizations and embryo investment (Arnold 1994; Morgan 1994; Eberhard 1996; Skogsmyr and Lankinen 2002; Jones and Ratterman 2009; Moore and Pannell 2011). It should be noted that even though competition over fertilization at post-copulatory stages will involve competition between haploid sperm or pollen, the definition implies that sperm and pollen traits can only be sexually selected if these traits enhance reproductive success of the sperm- or pollen-producing diploid individual (Parker 1970; Willson 1979).…”
Section: Sexual Selection and Sexual Conflict In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%