1996
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04342-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptophycin 1 binds to tubulin at a site distinct from the colchicine binding site and at a site that may overlap the vinca binding site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…alkaloids so that it is likely that the cryptophycins interact with the Vinca alkaloid binding domain or at a site that overlaps with the Vinca alkaloid binding domain of tubulin [10,11,[15][16][17][18]. Cryptophycins are also exquisitely potent inducers of bcl-2 phosphorylation [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…alkaloids so that it is likely that the cryptophycins interact with the Vinca alkaloid binding domain or at a site that overlaps with the Vinca alkaloid binding domain of tubulin [10,11,[15][16][17][18]. Cryptophycins are also exquisitely potent inducers of bcl-2 phosphorylation [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Antimitotic agents that can deplete cellular microtubules have been classified into 2 major binding sites: vinblastine site and colchicine site (Hamel, 1990;Ludueña et al, 1995). Tubulin binding study using 3 H-CP-52 showed that vinblastine, but not taxol, can effectively inhibit the binding of 3 H-CP-52 to isolated tubulin (Table II), suggesting that CP-52 binds to a region near or identical to the vinca domain (Kerksiek et al, 1995;Mooberry et al, 1996). Our findings are in agreement with those reported previously by other investigators (Smith and Zhang, 1996) who showed that CP-1 inhibited the binding of 3 H-vinblastine, but not colchicine, to 1 H-125 (1.5 ϫ 10 5 /tube) and THP-1 (2.5 ϫ 10 5 /tube) cells were treated with various doses of unlabeled agents as indicated and 3 H-CP-52 (10 ng/tube) in 0.5 ml PBS without FCS for 20 min at 23°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data suggest that cryptophycin binds within the Vinca alkaloid binding domain of tubulin because cryptophycin inhibited the binding of [ 3 H]vinblastine to tubulin yet did not inhibit the binding of colchicine (Kerksiek et al, 1995;Smith and Zhang, 1996;Bai et al, 1996). The tryptic and chymotryptic cleavage of tubulin in the presence of cryptophycin 1 was consistent with occupation of the Vinca binding site and distinct from occupation of the colchicine binding site (Mooberry et al, 1996). In other respects cryptophycin differs from the Vinca alkaloids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Cryptophycin 1 was originally isolated from cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc (Schwartz et al, 1990) and is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation; like the Vinca alkaloids, it causes the specific loss of cellular microtubules (Smith et al, 1994). The direct interaction of cryptophycin 1 and tubulin has been demonstrated (Kerksiek et al, 1995;Mooberry et al, 1996;Smith and Zhang, 1996;Bai et al, 1996). Data suggest that cryptophycin binds within the Vinca alkaloid binding domain of tubulin because cryptophycin inhibited the binding of [ 3 H]vinblastine to tubulin yet did not inhibit the binding of colchicine (Kerksiek et al, 1995;Smith and Zhang, 1996;Bai et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%