2002
DOI: 10.4314/eamj.v79i10.8820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptosporidiosis among animal handlers and their Livestock in Basrah, Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…was 20% and 16%, respectively. These percentages were higher than percentage 6.6% and 1.7% reported by Mahdi and Ali (2002) for animals handlers and non-animal handlers respectively. On the other hand, Entamoeba in the animals handlers was 7 out of 60 (11.6%) while in non-animal handlers was 8 out of 175 (4.5%).…”
Section: Research Journal For Veterinary Practitionerscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…was 20% and 16%, respectively. These percentages were higher than percentage 6.6% and 1.7% reported by Mahdi and Ali (2002) for animals handlers and non-animal handlers respectively. On the other hand, Entamoeba in the animals handlers was 7 out of 60 (11.6%) while in non-animal handlers was 8 out of 175 (4.5%).…”
Section: Research Journal For Veterinary Practitionerscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in animalhandlers, e.g., horse-handlers, was almost five times higher than in non-animal-handlers; and the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in horses in that study was 12% (Mahdi and Ali 2002). An outbreak of cryptosporidiosis among veterinary hospital personnel that cared for a Cryptosporidium-infected pony demonstrated that zoonotic transmission can occur, even in an environment with obligatory high hygiene standards (Konkle et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is limited information on the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis among farm animals. In one study conducted in Basra, Iraq, cryptosporidiosis was diagnosed in 20 % of cattle; however, no single positive case was detected among camels (Mahdi & Ali, 2002). Furthermore, recent subtyping studies have shown that not all C. parvum infections in humans are due to zoonotic transmission (Alves et al, 2003;Mallon et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%