2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptosporidium oocysts on fresh produce from areas of high livestock production in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fresh vegetables and soft fruit have been investigated using IMS and molecular methods [87]. Cryptosporidium oocysts were found on 6 of 128 vegetables, and C. parvum was identified by subtyping (gp60) from celery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fresh vegetables and soft fruit have been investigated using IMS and molecular methods [87]. Cryptosporidium oocysts were found on 6 of 128 vegetables, and C. parvum was identified by subtyping (gp60) from celery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryptosporidium oocysts were found on 6 of 128 vegetables, and C. parvum was identified by subtyping (gp60) from celery. The authors speculated that the presence of Cryptosporidium on vegetables could be associated with products originating from regions with considerable livestock production [87]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the concerns include that the recovery efficiencies achieved by Cook et al (2006aCook et al ( , 2007 were not duplicated in independent or semiindependent studies (e.g. Amoros, Alonso, & Cuesta, 2010;Rzezutka et al, 2010); even in the validation studies in which 'expert' labs participated, although recovery efficiencies for Cryptosporidium from raspberries were similar to those of the developing lab, the recovery efficiencies of Cryptosporidium from lettuce were significantly lower (Cook et al, 2006b) and also misidentification of oocysts was a problem, despite the participating labs being described as 'expert'. Furthermore, the Standard ISO Method 18744 is for both Cryptosporidium and Giardia, but the publications on which the Standard Method are largely based (Cook et al, 2006a(Cook et al, , 2006b, only address Cryptosporidium parvum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, Cryptosporidium was detected in samples of the water used by apple cider producers for washing apples (21), and Tram et al (47) detected Cyclospora in " sprinkling water" used to keep produce fresh in markets. Contamination of produce by livestock, either through direct access or through the application of manure to crop lands, has also been proposed (14,35,43). Other possible sources of contamination of vegetables with intestinal parasites include insects and rodents, other wildlife, market vendors, and even contam inated money handled by food workers (14,24,45,46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%