1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf00744430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal and molecular structure of hexanitrobenzene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Ma et al carefully investigated and compared the molecular structures of 20 traditional EMs composed of C, H, O, and N atoms. , According to the previously mentioned definition, TATB, DATB, NQ, DAAzF, DAAF, DNDP, NTO, TNA, α-FOX-7, LLM-105, and TNB belong to low-sensitivity or insensitive EMs; whereas ONDO, PETN, TNAZ, RDX, β-HMX, BCHMX, HNB, ONC, ε-CL-20, and BTF belong to sensitive ones. Among these 20 energetic molecules, only the sensitive BTF is hydrogen free.…”
Section: Planar π-Bonded Energetic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ma et al carefully investigated and compared the molecular structures of 20 traditional EMs composed of C, H, O, and N atoms. , According to the previously mentioned definition, TATB, DATB, NQ, DAAzF, DAAF, DNDP, NTO, TNA, α-FOX-7, LLM-105, and TNB belong to low-sensitivity or insensitive EMs; whereas ONDO, PETN, TNAZ, RDX, β-HMX, BCHMX, HNB, ONC, ε-CL-20, and BTF belong to sensitive ones. Among these 20 energetic molecules, only the sensitive BTF is hydrogen free.…”
Section: Planar π-Bonded Energetic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, most HEDMs have relatively low symmetry with the space group number (SGN) smaller than 62, with P2 1 /c (SGN = 14) being the most popular space group. Furthermore, the geometries of the 67 HEDMs were optimized based on the conjugate gradient method (Magnus and Stiefel, 1952), with the lattice parameters and atomic coordinates from single-crystal X-ray crystallography data as input (Crawford et al, 2007;Cai et al, 1983;Akopyan et al, 1966;Cady and Larson, 1965;Bagryanskaya and Gatilov, 1983;Meents et al, 2008;Wilkins and Small, 1982;Lind, 1970;Bracuti, 1996;Zhurova et al, 2006Zhurova et al, , 2007Nie et al, 2001;Bryden, 1972;Adam et al, 2002;Trotter, 1960;Oyumi and Brill, 1988;Graeber and Morosin, 1974;Altmann et al, 1998;Choi, 1981;Turley, 1968;Espenbetov et al, 1984;Archibald et al, 1990;Zhurova and Pinkerton, 2001;Li et al, 2005;Abrahams, 1950;Reeve and Miller, 2002;Sarma and Nagaraju, 2000;Dickinson et al, 1966;Hakey et al, 2008;Millar et al, 2009Millar et al, , 2010Cady et al, 1963Cady et al, , 1966Cobbledick and Small, 1974;;Ou et al, 1998;Bolotina et al, 2004;Thallapally et al, 2004;…”
Section: Crystalline Structures: Theoretical Optimization and Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the electron pushing amine group, which pushes electrons into the bond, and as a consequence the bond length is shortened. Comparing the bond lengths with benzene derivatives with uniform groups, such as hexaaminobenzene and hexanitrobenzene, equal bond lengths of about 1.39 Å are observed [22][23]. The same effect is seen with the different CÀ N bond lengths.…”
Section: Single Crystal Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%