2021
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal graph attention networks for the prediction of stable materials

Abstract: Graph neural networks for crystal structures typically use the atomic positions and the atomic species as input. Unfortunately, this information is not available when predicting new materials, for which the precise geometrical information is unknown. We circumvent this problem by replacing the precise bond distances with embeddings of graph distances. This allows our networks to be applied directly in high-throughput studies based on both composition and crystal structure prototype without using relaxed struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our starting point was the dataset used in the machine learning study of ref. 21 . This included PBE calculations stemming from the Materials Project database 2 , AFLOW 1 , and our own calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our starting point was the dataset used in the machine learning study of ref. 21 . This included PBE calculations stemming from the Materials Project database 2 , AFLOW 1 , and our own calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work 21 we combined data from the AFLOW database 1 , the Materials Project 2 and from our own group to create a rather complete convex hull of thermodynamic stability at the PBE level. The details of the selection of the dataset can be found in ref.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[38] The attention mechanism has been adapted in several ML architectures for materials property prediction with improved accuracy. [28,30,33,37,[39][40][41][42] We show that Finder can outperform some state-of-the-art stoichiometry-only models such as Roost and compete with crystal graph models such as MEGNet and CGCNN on diverse benchmark databases curated from the Materials Project (MP) repository. Compared to other models revisited in this work, our model displays faster convergence and achieves lower errors at all training set sizes explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based our approach on the use of machine learning (ML) techniques, with a focus on probabilistic models and artificial neural networks. Limited by the amount of available composition-property data, conventional ML approaches in alloy design have to predominantly rely on simulation data, often with only limited experimental validation ( 9 , 10 ). As the experimental microstructure database continues to expand, ML obtains higher accuracy in predicting the phase or microstructure of materials ( 11 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%