2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal growth and characterization of LuAG:Ce:Tb scintillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect is reducing the temperature at which the single crystals are grown. The very high growth temperatures (e.g., ∼2000 °C in a typical Czochralski growth) are responsible for the high defect concentration in garnets, e.g., antisite defects . An option is to make transparent ceramics from (nano)crystalline powders at lower temperatures (1500–1700 °C), as has been successfully demonstrated for YAG. , This route might lead to more efficient LuAG:Ce scintillators and may also lead to a further enhancement of the light yield upon codoping with Tb 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect is reducing the temperature at which the single crystals are grown. The very high growth temperatures (e.g., ∼2000 °C in a typical Czochralski growth) are responsible for the high defect concentration in garnets, e.g., antisite defects . An option is to make transparent ceramics from (nano)crystalline powders at lower temperatures (1500–1700 °C), as has been successfully demonstrated for YAG. , This route might lead to more efficient LuAG:Ce scintillators and may also lead to a further enhancement of the light yield upon codoping with Tb 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the many interesting possible applications for LuAG, we felt it was of interest to explore new routes to single crystals of the material. It is normally grown, similar to YAG, by the classical Czochralski route, , as well as micropulling-down (μ-PD) , and vertical Bridgman methods . However, the melting point of LuAG is over 100 °C higher than YAG (2060 °C vs 1930 °C), making melt methods somewhat more problematic .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron traps are situated not far below the CB. On one hand, there are indications in powder/ceramic samples of (Lu,Tb) 3 Al 5 O 12 :Ce that Tb contributes to energy migration (Batentschuk et al, 2004;Setlur et al, 2011); on the other hand, this has not been observed in bulk crystal (Zhuravleva et al, 2010). However, the bottom of the lowest Ce 5d band also shifts toward the bandgap.…”
Section: Scintillator-based Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 94%