2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal-melt kinetic coefficients of Ni3Al

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For T-fixed properties, the system was maintained at a given temperature for a while. (ii) The isothermal two-phase method (see for example [34,39,40]) was used to determine the melting temperatures of pure Ni and Al, B2-NiAl and L1 2 -Ni 3 Al intermetallic compounds. Each sample was created at a given temperature T in the range of 800 K-2000 K (10 K step) with the corresponding lattice parameters and velocities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For T-fixed properties, the system was maintained at a given temperature for a while. (ii) The isothermal two-phase method (see for example [34,39,40]) was used to determine the melting temperatures of pure Ni and Al, B2-NiAl and L1 2 -Ni 3 Al intermetallic compounds. Each sample was created at a given temperature T in the range of 800 K-2000 K (10 K step) with the corresponding lattice parameters and velocities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the diffusion coefficient obtained from time-evolution mean square displacement (MSD) is adopted to illuminate the movement of atoms, and MSD x represents atom movement along the x direction in Figure b. In MD simulations, the crystal growth velocity can be approximated as the moving rate of a planar liquid–crystal interface and expressed as the ratio of the moving distance to the crystallization time as v = Δ L/ Δ t , with Δ L = L 2 – L 1 . For example, for Cu-intercalated GO 0.1 , L 1 equals 66 Å after relaxation, that is, t = 5 ps by profiles of density/mass given in Figure c.…”
Section: Theoretical Models and MD Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r i denotes the distances of the first and second nearest neighbours in the simulated structure and r bcc refers to the first and second nearest neighbour distance for the ideal bcc crystal. This definition of order parameter is known to result in φ k ≈ 0 for an atom in the bcc solid and non-zero for atoms in the melt regions: see for example [29,9]. Thus, the φ k , defined for every atom k helps us distinguish the solid and liquid regions.…”
Section: Identification Of the Interface Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where weighting function w is defined as w(z p ) = 1 − ( zp d ) 2 2 for |z p | < d (cut-off distance), else w(z p ) = 0 and z k is atom coordinates of atom k. In the z-direction the simulation block is discretised into bins and order parameters are averaged over all atoms in the bin; we use a cut-off distance of 7 Å in order to avoid the smearing out of the information [33]. The position of the interface at any instant is determined by fitting a function f (z) = c 1 + c 2 tanh z−c3 c4 to the order parameter data (φ(z p )), where z is the coordinates of the atoms along the direction perpendicular to the solid-melt interface and the fitting parameter c 3 denotes the interface position [29]. The plot of the order parameters along with the fit of the hyperbolic tangent function is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Identification Of the Interface Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%