2021
DOI: 10.1107/s1600576721001229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal orientation and detector distance effects on resolving pseudosymmetry by electron backscatter diffraction

Abstract: Accurately indexing pseudosymmetric materials has long proven challenging for electron backscatter diffraction. The recent emergence of intensity-based indexing approaches promises an enhanced ability to resolve pseudosymmetry compared with traditional Hough-based indexing approaches. However, little work has been done to understand the effects of sample position and orientation on the ability to resolve pseudosymmetry, especially for intensity-based indexing approaches. Thus, in this work the effects of cryst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d-f Pole figures from the region highlighted by a white solid line in a-c, showing the average austenite (A2) orientation and the indicated predicted and measured martensite (A1) orientations, revealing incorrect indexing also for some uniformly indexed regions, e.g., those colored in dark pink in c fct poles are located in the proximity of {110} A2 poles (and {100} A1/fct close to {100} A2 ) as demonstrated in Figure 6e, f is an example how some bias (e.g., uncorrected distortions in the EBSD pattern) might lead the indexing algorithm favoring an incorrect solution. It has not yet been tested whether there is some systematic crystal orientation dependence of the success rate for correct indexing as worked out recently for another tetragonal material with cubic pseudosymmetry [39].…”
Section: Attempts Of Tetragonal Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d-f Pole figures from the region highlighted by a white solid line in a-c, showing the average austenite (A2) orientation and the indicated predicted and measured martensite (A1) orientations, revealing incorrect indexing also for some uniformly indexed regions, e.g., those colored in dark pink in c fct poles are located in the proximity of {110} A2 poles (and {100} A1/fct close to {100} A2 ) as demonstrated in Figure 6e, f is an example how some bias (e.g., uncorrected distortions in the EBSD pattern) might lead the indexing algorithm favoring an incorrect solution. It has not yet been tested whether there is some systematic crystal orientation dependence of the success rate for correct indexing as worked out recently for another tetragonal material with cubic pseudosymmetry [39].…”
Section: Attempts Of Tetragonal Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dictionary‐based orientation refinement is another method to measure orientation of EBSD, for example, Refs. 26, 27 and 28. These dictionary‐based methods are based on the idea of image matching, where orientation refinement is achieved by matching template patterns.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%