2000
DOI: 10.1021/om000123s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal Packing Forces Dictate η1- versus η2-Coordination of Benzyl Groups in [Guanidinate]Zr(CH2Ph)3

Abstract: An X-ray structure determination of {CyNC-[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ]NCy}Zr(CH 2 Ph) 3 , crystallized from pentane, differs from the solid-state structure previously reported for the same compound crystallized from toluene. In contrast to the earlier report, we find no evidence for the presence of an η 2 interaction in the solid state by X-ray crystallography or in solution by means of 1 H or 13 C NMR spectroscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of the (neutral) guanidine, predicted to proceed by protonolysis of the zinc−carbon linkage. The ligand precursors, [R 2 NC{NR′}{NHR′}], were prepared from the reaction between the lithium diamide LiNR 2 (R = SiMe 3 , Me) and i PrN=C=N i Pr, followed by quenching of the intermediate lithium salt with a stoichiometric amount of water, to afford [Me 2 NC(N i Pr)(NH i Pr)] ( 1 ) and [(Me 3 Si) 2 NC(N i Pr)(NH i Pr)] ( 2 ) 26. The compounds were isolated as colourless and yellow liquids, respectively, and were used without further purification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the (neutral) guanidine, predicted to proceed by protonolysis of the zinc−carbon linkage. The ligand precursors, [R 2 NC{NR′}{NHR′}], were prepared from the reaction between the lithium diamide LiNR 2 (R = SiMe 3 , Me) and i PrN=C=N i Pr, followed by quenching of the intermediate lithium salt with a stoichiometric amount of water, to afford [Me 2 NC(N i Pr)(NH i Pr)] ( 1 ) and [(Me 3 Si) 2 NC(N i Pr)(NH i Pr)] ( 2 ) 26. The compounds were isolated as colourless and yellow liquids, respectively, and were used without further purification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors could be considered as influencing this behavior: i) the higher covalent character of U(IV) 53 could favor stronger U-N interations in 4; ii) the effect of electrostatic repulsion in U-L interactions in anionic 5 relative to neutral 4 may result in a lower coordination number; iii) in situations where the energy differences are small, crystal packing effects cannot be ruled out. 54 Notably, 5 was the main product of the reaction between 3 and UI3(1,4-dioxane)1.5 regardless of the stoichiometry used; no U(III) products with increased coordination numbers were isolated.…”
Section: (Scheme 2)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[56] Unrestricted DFT calculations on the thorium aminodiboranate complex [Th(H 3 BNMe 2 BH 3 ) 4 ] provide a 16-coodinate structure; however single-crystal X-ray and neutron diffraction studies indicate that the ligands distort and the Th center becomes 15-coordinate when placed within a nonsymmetric crystal environment. [57] If periodic boundary conditions are imposed based on the experimental cell dimensions, DFT calculations reproduce the 15-coordinate structure.…”
Section: Assessing the Effect Of Crystal Packing Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%