2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8fd90031k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure evaluation: calculating relative stabilities and other criteria: general discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study also found that further refining the crystal structures with higher-level wave function models frequently decreased the molar volumes relative to the B86bPBE-XDM calculations, bringing them into closer agreement with the experiment. However, such wave function-based calculations are somewhat more computationally expensive, so they are not pursued here.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study also found that further refining the crystal structures with higher-level wave function models frequently decreased the molar volumes relative to the B86bPBE-XDM calculations, bringing them into closer agreement with the experiment. However, such wave function-based calculations are somewhat more computationally expensive, so they are not pursued here.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 There is an ongoing effort to develop theoretical methods that would reliably describe such minute differences. [3][4][5][6] When the binding energy of a solid or a molecular cluster is decomposed using many-body expansion, the twobody contribution, corresponding to the binding of dimers, is the largest and as such it receives most of the attention in method development. However, nonadditive higher-order contributions, such as three-body and four-body terms can be important as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such molecular solids often have different phases or polymorphs that differ very little in energy. , For example, in more than half of the polymorph pairs studied by Nyman and Day, the lattice energy difference was found to be less than 0.5 kcal/mol . There is an ongoing effort to develop theoretical methods that would reliably describe such minute differences. When the binding energy of a solid or a molecular cluster is decomposed using many-body expansion, the two-body contribution, corresponding to the binding of dimers, is the largest and as such it receives most of the attention in method development. However, nonadditive higher-order contributions, such as three-body and four-body terms can be important as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify and improve the accuracy of in-silico crystal structure prediction, heat capacities of different polymorphs from 0 K to room temperature are of interest, so that their calculated stability hierarchies and energy contents can be compared with experimental values. [3][4][5][6] Therefore, in this paper, heat capacity data are reported starting at 10 K (with extrapolation to 0 K) for forms I and III. Both forms convert into form II around room temperature followed by melting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%