1996
DOI: 10.1002/cber.19961291024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal Structure of a Representative Mixed Adduct of Trimethylaluminium and a Lithium Amide and a Theoretical MO Study on Model Systems

Abstract: Reaction of the simple alane adduct [Me,Al . HN(CH,Ph),] existence here can be attributed to the stabilising effect of (2) with the lithium amide [(PhCH,),NLi] leads to the forma-the attached Me3Al ligand. Crystalline 2 adopts the classical, tion of the mixed adduct [Me3A1 . (PhCH2),NLi . distorted-tetrahedral arrangement of simple monomeric HN(CH,Ph),] (1). The crystal structures of 1 and 2 are re-alane adducts. Ab initio MO calculations on model systems ported. Exhibiting a four-membered, mixed-metal, mixed-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fold angle about the N(1)···N(1a) axis in the gallium analogue is 2.7°. The bond angles and distances for the Al 2 N 2 core are well within the range of values reported for other aminoalane dimers derived from secondary amines. ,, The Al−N distance in 3 , which is formally a dative bond, has been reported as 2.058 Å 2 Molecular structure of 2 showing the atom-labeling scheme. 3 Selected Bond Lengths (Å) and Angles (deg) for 2 Al(1)···Al(2) 2.783 (3) Al(1)−N(1) 1.982 (4) Al(1)−C(1) 1.962 (7) Al(1)−C(2) 1.981 (10) Al(1)−N(1a) 1.982 (4) Al(2)−N(1) 1.984 (4) Al(2)−C(3) 1.977 (9) Al(2)−C(4) 1.951 (11) Al(2)−N(1a) 1.984 (4) N(1)−C(10) 1.512 (7) N(1)−C(20) 1.498 (7) N(1)−Al(1)−C(1) 111.4 (2) C(1)−Al(1)−C(2) 118.0 (4) N(1)−Al(1)−C(2) 111.0 (3) N(1)−Al(1)−N(1a) 90.9 (2) C(1)−Al(1)−N(1a) 111.4 (2) C(2)−Al(1)−N(1a) 111.0 (3) N(1)−Al(2)−C(3) 109.2 (3) C(3)−Al(2)−C(4) 118.5 (5) N(1)−Al(2)−C(4) 112.9 (3) N(1)−Al(2)−N(1a) 90.7 (3) C(3)−Al(2)−N(1a) 109.2 (3) C(4)−Al(2)−N(1a) 112.9 (3) Al(1)−N(1)−Al(2) 89.1 (1) Al(1)−N(1)−C(10) 113.7 (3) Al(2)−N(1)−C(10) 114.2 (4) Al(1)−N(1)−C(20) 114.5 (4) Al(2)−N(1)−C(20) 113.0 (3) C(10)−N(1)−C(20) 110.8 (3) N(1)−C(10)−C(11) 115.2 (4) N(1)−C(20)−C(21) 116.8 (4)
…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fold angle about the N(1)···N(1a) axis in the gallium analogue is 2.7°. The bond angles and distances for the Al 2 N 2 core are well within the range of values reported for other aminoalane dimers derived from secondary amines. ,, The Al−N distance in 3 , which is formally a dative bond, has been reported as 2.058 Å 2 Molecular structure of 2 showing the atom-labeling scheme. 3 Selected Bond Lengths (Å) and Angles (deg) for 2 Al(1)···Al(2) 2.783 (3) Al(1)−N(1) 1.982 (4) Al(1)−C(1) 1.962 (7) Al(1)−C(2) 1.981 (10) Al(1)−N(1a) 1.982 (4) Al(2)−N(1) 1.984 (4) Al(2)−C(3) 1.977 (9) Al(2)−C(4) 1.951 (11) Al(2)−N(1a) 1.984 (4) N(1)−C(10) 1.512 (7) N(1)−C(20) 1.498 (7) N(1)−Al(1)−C(1) 111.4 (2) C(1)−Al(1)−C(2) 118.0 (4) N(1)−Al(1)−C(2) 111.0 (3) N(1)−Al(1)−N(1a) 90.9 (2) C(1)−Al(1)−N(1a) 111.4 (2) C(2)−Al(1)−N(1a) 111.0 (3) N(1)−Al(2)−C(3) 109.2 (3) C(3)−Al(2)−C(4) 118.5 (5) N(1)−Al(2)−C(4) 112.9 (3) N(1)−Al(2)−N(1a) 90.7 (3) C(3)−Al(2)−N(1a) 109.2 (3) C(4)−Al(2)−N(1a) 112.9 (3) Al(1)−N(1)−Al(2) 89.1 (1) Al(1)−N(1)−C(10) 113.7 (3) Al(2)−N(1)−C(10) 114.2 (4) Al(1)−N(1)−C(20) 114.5 (4) Al(2)−N(1)−C(20) 113.0 (3) C(10)−N(1)−C(20) 110.8 (3) N(1)−C(10)−C(11) 115.2 (4) N(1)−C(20)−C(21) 116.8 (4)
…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Addition of Me 3 Al to HN(CH 2 Ph) 2 in 1:1 mol ratio at −70 °C leads to the formation of the Me 3 Al·HN(CH 2 Ph) 2 adduct ( 3 ), whose synthesis, characterization, and molecular structure have been reported. Careful thermolysis of 3 at 120 °C in toluene solution yields the aminoalane dimer, [Me 2 AlN(CH 2 Ph) 2 ] 2 , 2 , via CH 4 elimination .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, studies on the bridging action of the AlMe groups in lithium aluminates have only used X-ray diffraction, where the direct observation of the H atoms during Fourier synthesis is absent. Information on the role of H in such bridges has been inferred from short Li–C(alkyl) bonds that have been noted to complete four-membered metallacycles in several aluminate structures. However, while the negatively hyperconjugated dimer of (2-C 5 H 4 N)(Me 3 Si) 2 CLi has been probed thoroughly, a survey of the Cambridge Structural Database reveals that only one single-crystal neutron diffraction study of a lithium aluminate has ever been reported . In fact, the current volume of literature devoted to a detailed structural analysis of any type of metal–methyl agostic interaction remains modest, as the positions of methyl hydrogen atoms are notoriously difficult to locate using any method other than neutron diffraction. As yet, only one comprehensive neutron study focusing on agostic interactions to lithium ions has been reported, though interactions of this type had been identified before the formal classification of agostic interactions. , In addition, few compounds incorporating intermolecular C–H···Li agostic interactions have been reported; rarer still are those involving di- and trifurcated interactions, for which only a handful of structures are known, few being neutron-derived structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The title compound, (I), was formed by accident, instead of the expected sulfenamide. A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.26;Allen, 2002) for coordination compounds with dibenzylamine yielded only ten structures, namely chloro(dibenzylamine-N)dimethylaluminium(III) (Craig et al, 1998), bis(dibenzylamine-N)bis(N,N-dibenzylcarbamato-O)copper (II) (Dell'Amico et al, 2002), ( 2 -dibenzylamido)dibenzylaminetrimethylaluminiumlithium (Armstrong et al, 1996), dibenzylaminotrimethylaluminium (Armstrong et al, 1996), bis[( 2 -tetrahydridoborate-H,H,H 0 ,H 0 )bis(dibenzylamino)lithium] (Giese et al, 2001), dibenzylaminotrimethylgallium (Lake et al, 1999), dibenzylaminotrimethylindium (Lake et al, 1999), bis(dibenzylamine)bis(ethylthioacetato)copper(II) (Sato & Ouchi, 1982), catena-bis(dibenzylamine-N)bis( 2 -thiocyanato-S,N)cadmium(II) (Taniguchi & Ouchi, 1987) and trichlorobis(dibenzylamino)indium (Pauls et al, 2001). Here, we present the crystal structure of the title compound, (I).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%