2001
DOI: 10.1038/35055589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of photosystem II from Synechococcus elongatus at 3.8 Å resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

110
1,836
10
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,972 publications
(1,967 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
110
1,836
10
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with the estimated 10 Å center to center distance between the metal centers of these chlorophylls from electron and X-ray diffraction studies of PSII crystals (17,18,73) as opposed to the 7.6 Å found in bacterial reaction centers (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Location Of 3 P As a Function Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This observation is consistent with the estimated 10 Å center to center distance between the metal centers of these chlorophylls from electron and X-ray diffraction studies of PSII crystals (17,18,73) as opposed to the 7.6 Å found in bacterial reaction centers (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Location Of 3 P As a Function Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this way, excitation energy migrates from the peripheral antenna, via minor light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complexes, towards the inner antenna surrounding the reaction centre. In the inner antenna of PS II, chlorophyll a molecules are also held in a scaffold with centre-to-centre distance of 8.5-13.5 Å as determined by X-ray crystallography [8]. This range of distances is the same as that (9-14 Å) in the peripheral antenna determined by electron crystallography [7].…”
Section: Excitation Energy Transfermentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The high to low potential −300 mV transition of the cytochrome midpoint potential, from high to low potential, caused by heat or trypsin treatment was attributed to membrane damage and loss of the local hydrophobic niche (Krishtalik et al 1993), and perhaps a contribution from changes in orientation of the orthogonal histidine ligands (Babcock et al 1985). (vi) The α-β heterodimeric structure and stromal side location of the heme of Cyt b-559 in the PS II reaction center has been confirmed in the crystal structure determination of the reaction center dimer purified from cyanobacteria to a resolution of 3.7-3.8 Å (Zouni et al 2001;Kamiya and Shen 2003), although the orientation of the histidine side chains of the cytochrome cannot be determined at this resolution. The X-ray structure showing one stromal-side heme appears to have settled any question about the heterodimeric nature of Cyt b-559.…”
Section: Structure-function Of Cytochrome B-559mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The oxidation was blocked by the quinol analogue inhibitor, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-(dimethylurea) (DCMU) (Horton and Cramer 1975;Horton et al 1976). If I had known the distances of separation between Cyt b-559 and its closest redox partners, approximately 28 Å centercenter between Q B and the b-559 heme, and 27 Å between the heme and chlorophyll Z (on D2 protein), which were shown in the crystal structure of PS II (Zouni et al 2001), I would not have felt so badly at that time about Bessel's comment. The present structure data show that the redox reactions between the Q B acceptor of PS II and Cyt b-559 cannot be very fast.…”
Section: Structure-function Of Cytochrome B-559mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation