“…The Ta2−Cl1 bond length, 2.89(5) Å, is substantially longer than any of the following sums of radii: Ta 5+ −Cl − = 0.64 52,54 (0.68) 56 + 1.81 = 2.45 (2.49) Å, Ta 4+ −Cl − = 0.68 + 1.81 = 2.49 Å, and Ta 3+ −Cl − = 0.72 + 1.81 = 2.53 Å. 52,54,56 Lower oxidation states for Ta are not considered because octahedral hexachlorotantalum has been reported only for Ta(V) and Ta(IV); 55 The difference, 0.40 Å, between the Ta2−Cl1 distance, 2.89(5) Å, and the sum of the Ta 5+ and Cl − ionic radii, 0.68 + 1.81 = 2.49 Å, 57 is therefore too large to be explained by decreasing the oxidation state at Ta2 from 5+ to a lower value. Shannon estimates that the difference in octahedral radius between Ta 5+ and Ta 3+ is 0.08 Å.…”