1996
DOI: 10.1016/0923-2494(96)89644-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of the MHC class Ib molecule H2-M3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the greater susceptibility of MR1 to substitutions in the A versus F pockets suggests it may have a similar mechanism of terminal ligand anchoring as class Ia molecules. In addition, susceptibility to A pocket perturbations may suggest that MR1 binds ligands with a unique N terminus like the strong preference of H2-M3 for formylated peptides (66). Regardless of the explanation, the phenotype of MR1 mutants at sites involved in terminal peptide binding of class Ia molecules provides further supporting evidence that MR1 binds a ligand.…”
Section: Mr1 Mutations At Sites Involved In Terminal Peptide Binding mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, the greater susceptibility of MR1 to substitutions in the A versus F pockets suggests it may have a similar mechanism of terminal ligand anchoring as class Ia molecules. In addition, susceptibility to A pocket perturbations may suggest that MR1 binds ligands with a unique N terminus like the strong preference of H2-M3 for formylated peptides (66). Regardless of the explanation, the phenotype of MR1 mutants at sites involved in terminal peptide binding of class Ia molecules provides further supporting evidence that MR1 binds a ligand.…”
Section: Mr1 Mutations At Sites Involved In Terminal Peptide Binding mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Taking this into consideration, the requirements that are essential for binding to H2-M3, namely hydrophobic amino acid composition and interactions with essentially only four N-terminal residues, the number of N-terminal sequence permutations for H2-M3 ligands is limited. Of those hydrophobic peptides that do bind to H2-M3, the amino acid side chains are buried within the H2-M3-binding groove and therefore inaccessible to TCR (9,41). Hence, similar surface characteristics that are formed by the H2-M3 molecule with different ligands might result in cross-reactive recognition by a given TCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, pathogen or tumour-derived peptides bind to numerous class Ib molecules including HLA-E, Q9, Qa-1 b , and H2-M3 (Table 1). In HFE, the antigen-binding cleft is narrowed by a shift of the a1-helix towards the a2-helix, resulting in the burial of the peptide-binding pockets so that HFE is precluded from binding peptides ( Figure 2) [21]. Nevertheless, somewhat paradoxically, T-cell responses directed at HFE have also been reported recently [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%