2001
DOI: 10.1172/jci13890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of the TRANCE/RANKL cytokine reveals determinants of receptor-ligand specificity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the TNFR1-TNFβ or DR5-TRAIL complex, the hydrophobic interaction between Loop1 of the receptor and the DE loop of the ligand is the main force for binding, with the conserved tyrosine residue in the DE loop penetrating the hydrophobic groove formed by hydrophobic residues in Loop1 (23)(24)(25). However, Ile248 of eRANKL, which is equivalent to the Tyr residue in TNFR or DR5, is thought to be only marginal for receptor binding, because the I248D mutant maintained binding activity to RANK (28). This was corroborated in the structures presented here, because the electron densities of the Ile248 residues in the DE loop (residues 245-250) were very poor in both free (29) and ligand-bound forms (current study).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the TNFR1-TNFβ or DR5-TRAIL complex, the hydrophobic interaction between Loop1 of the receptor and the DE loop of the ligand is the main force for binding, with the conserved tyrosine residue in the DE loop penetrating the hydrophobic groove formed by hydrophobic residues in Loop1 (23)(24)(25). However, Ile248 of eRANKL, which is equivalent to the Tyr residue in TNFR or DR5, is thought to be only marginal for receptor binding, because the I248D mutant maintained binding activity to RANK (28). This was corroborated in the structures presented here, because the electron densities of the Ile248 residues in the DE loop (residues 245-250) were very poor in both free (29) and ligand-bound forms (current study).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the key structural features in the binding interface that control the biological specificity of a particular ligand-receptor pair have not been defined. For example, the binding mode between RANKL and RANK is not yet clearly understood, although the crystal structure of RANKL was extensively characterized (28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different isoforms are able to differentially regulate osteoclastogenesis [23][24][25]. In cells, RANKL forms homo-or hetero-trimer structures between the isoforms [26,27], and the trimeric combination of the isoforms is crucial for orientating the membranous localization, thereby controlling the osteoclast formation and differentiation process. Hence, the trimeric structure of RANKL1 alone or associated with RANKL2 is translated into a membranous localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sequence alignment, we incorporated known secondary structure from the following crystal structures: 1ALY of human CD40L (17), 1XU1 of murine APRIL bound to Taci (18); 1JTZ of human TNF-related activation-induced cytokine/RANKL (19); and 1D2Q of human TRAIL (20). For TWEAK, LIGHT, 4-1BBL, and FasL, ␤-sheet predictions from Bodmer et al (1) were used.…”
Section: Cloning and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%