“…Various studies, mentioned above, on the separation of nonracemic mixtures (i.e., enantiomeric enrichment) by sublimation or by crystallization, have proposed an explanation on different aspects of crystal lattices with respect to differences in intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the crystals of a racemate and the crystals of the constituent enantiomers. For example: (i) in the separation of ( RS )‐phenylglycine by preparing its ionic diastereomers (Figure , 1a , 1b ) with enantiomerically pure (1 S )‐(+)‐10‐camphorsulfonic acid, the unequal extent of the hydrogen bonds in the lattices of the two salts arising from the (conformational) differences in the cations and in the methylenesulfonate segments of the anions of the salts corresponding to the ( R )‐ and ( S )‐enantiomers have been held responsible for the lower solubility of the salt corresponding to the ( R )‐enantiomer in water; (ii) Kwart and Hoster, who based on their sublimation studies on (−)‐α‐ethylbenzylphenyl sulfide (Figure , 5 ), contended that there were forces involved that controlled crystal structure and crystal growth, rather than the disparities of bonding forces within the racemate and the pure enantiomer; (iii) Garin et al ., [ 66 ] in 1977, in the study of fractional sublimation of enantiomerically enriched mandelic and camphoric acids, matched their experimental data in terms of the fact that both fusion temperature and volatility were related to the intercrystalline forces; (iv) Katagiri et al ., [ 58 ] in 1996, attributed enantiomeric enrichment to stereoselective hydrogen bonding in the liquid state of the sample of isopropyl trifluorolactate 4 subjected to distillation; (v) while establishing nonlinear dependence on the enantiomer enrichment via measuring the equilibrium constants for the dimerization of enantiomers (i.e., the formation of homo‐ and heteroenantiomeric associates) of omeprazole, Baciocchi et al . [ 92 ] postulated that formation of hydrogen bonds between the sulfoxide (proton acceptor) and the benzimidazole (proton donor) moieties were responsible for the existence of diastereomeric dimers and the aprotic solvent CHCl 3 did not prevent the formation of hydrogen bonds; and (vi) Takahashi et al .…”