The title compounds were prepared by reacting the elements in an arc‐melting furnace and subsequent annealing. The LaRuSn3 type structure of the new compounds LnPtIn3 (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm) was refined from single crystal X‐ray data for LaPtIn3: Pm3n, a = 980.4(2) pm, wR2 = 0.0271, 399 F2 values, 15 variables. Striking structural motifs of LaPtIn3 are condensed distorted trigonal [PtIn6] prisms with Pt–In distances of 269 pm. The lanthanum atoms occupy large cavities within the polyhedral network. Besides Pt–In bonding In–In bonding also plays an important role in LaPtIn3 with In–In distances of 299 and 327 pm. The La1 position is occupied only to 91%, resulting in a composition La0.98(1)PtIn3. The La1 atoms show an extremely large displacement parameter indicating a rattling of these atoms in the In12 cages. The so far most indium rich compound in the ternary system lanthanum‐platinum‐indium is LaPtIn4 which was characterized on the basis of Guinier powder data: YNiAl4‐type, Cmcm, a = 455.1(2) pm, b = 1687.5(5) pm, and c = 738.3(2) pm. The platinum atoms in LaPtIn4 center trigonal prisms with the composition [La2In4]. Together with the indium atoms the platinum atoms form a complex three‐dimensional [PtIn4] polyanion in which the lanthanum atoms occupy large hexagonal tubes. The structure of Ce2Pt2In is confirmed: Mo2FeB2‐type, P4/mbm, a = 779.8(1) pm, c = 388.5(1) pm, wR2 = 0.0466, 433 F2 values, 12 parameters. It is built up from CsCl and AlB2 related slabs with the compositions CeIn and CePt2, respectively. Chemical bonding in the [PtIn3] and [PtIn4] polyanions of LaPtIn3 and LaPtIn4 is discussed.