2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5100812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystalline clusters in mW water: Stability, growth, and grain boundaries

Abstract: With numerical simulations of the mW model of water, we investigate the energetic stability of crystalline clusters for both Ice I (cubic and hexagonal ice) and for the metastable Ice 0 phase as a function of the cluster size. Under a large variety of forming conditions, we find that the most stable cluster changes as a function of size: at small sizes the Ice 0 phase produces the most stable clusters, while at large sizes there is a crossover to Ice I clusters. We further investigate the growth of crystalline… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in both cases the difference in all thermodynamic relevant quantities (such as free-energy difference, nucleation barrier, and solid/melt surface tension) between the competing polytypes are negligibly small (within 10 −3 k B T per particle for all cases) [1,5,[17][18][19][20][21]. For example, in the mW water model [16] the stacking fault between the ice I c and I h has been estimated as low as 0.16 ± 0.05 mJ m −2 at T = 218 K [4]. In this way, the nucleation mechanisms for both systems are determined not by bulk free energy properties, or by details of their interactions, but by general principles, which we aim at elucidating in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, in both cases the difference in all thermodynamic relevant quantities (such as free-energy difference, nucleation barrier, and solid/melt surface tension) between the competing polytypes are negligibly small (within 10 −3 k B T per particle for all cases) [1,5,[17][18][19][20][21]. For example, in the mW water model [16] the stacking fault between the ice I c and I h has been estimated as low as 0.16 ± 0.05 mJ m −2 at T = 218 K [4]. In this way, the nucleation mechanisms for both systems are determined not by bulk free energy properties, or by details of their interactions, but by general principles, which we aim at elucidating in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We focus here on the stable ice I polytypes (the cubic form I c , and the hexagonal form I h ), and on the metastable ice 0 structure [81,82]. We choose this polymorph as it is currently the only known structure to satisfy all the following criteria: it has the lowest free energy outside the stable cubic and hexagonal (ice I) structures [83]; it is the simplest structure that can be built by deformation of the diamond crystal while preserving to a large degree a highly regular fourfold coordination for the sites [84]; it can stack coherently (without breaking of bonds between grains) with the diamond crystal [4]. These structures have never been observed as fully formed crystals, and instead we focus on clusters of molecules whose nearest-neighbor environment is close to those found in the bulk ice 0 crystal.…”
Section: B Homogeneous Nucleation Of Mw Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Mercedes-Benz models [61,62] and the mW model [63,64] also belong to the class of coarse grained potentials. The appeal of coarse grained potentials is motivated by their high computational efficiency compared to atomistic models, allowing to considerably extend length and time-scales of simulations making it possible, for example, to study rare events like homogeneous nucleation in direct simulations [65,66]. Recently coarse grained models have also been used to interpolate between water-like and simple-liquid behaviours, studying how these properties change with varying one of the potential parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%