2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-022-0052-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystalline Phases Thermal Behaviour, Optical Energy Band Gap, and Broadband Radio Wave Frequency Dielectric Properties of PEO/PVDF Blend Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the graphical representation of ( h ν F km ) 2 against h ν can be used to evolve the band gap energy by extrapolating the linear portion to the X -axis ( h ν = 0), as manifested in Figure . It has been found that the band gap of Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 nanopowder is about 1.23 eV (Figure a), which agrees with many previous reports. On the other hand, the band gap energy of Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 is about 3.07 eV (Figure b), which is attributed to the presence of PVDF, which has a large band gap (5.66 eV) leading to widening of the band of the composite. Here, Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 has been mixed and filled inside the PVDF, and now, the band gap is the band gap of the whole composite (mixture) and not for Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 only.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, the graphical representation of ( h ν F km ) 2 against h ν can be used to evolve the band gap energy by extrapolating the linear portion to the X -axis ( h ν = 0), as manifested in Figure . It has been found that the band gap of Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 nanopowder is about 1.23 eV (Figure a), which agrees with many previous reports. On the other hand, the band gap energy of Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 is about 3.07 eV (Figure b), which is attributed to the presence of PVDF, which has a large band gap (5.66 eV) leading to widening of the band of the composite. Here, Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 has been mixed and filled inside the PVDF, and now, the band gap is the band gap of the whole composite (mixture) and not for Cu 1.8 Se 0.6 S 0.4 only.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can be seen from this figure that the visual optical transparency of both sets of SPE films decreases relatively with an increase in PEO amount in the PEO/PVP blend host matrix which is expected because the PVP is optically excellent transparent material 39 whereas PEO material film is of relatively poor transparency. 40 PiS film (Fig. 1c) appears with relatively better transparency compared to other samples which is due to high salt concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…17,19,42,43 In this relationship, the ΔH m0 is the melting enthalpy value of 100% crystalline PEO which is taken 213.7 J g −1 according to the literature. 17,19,40 The obtained X c values for these SPEs are listed in Table II and also plotted against x (wt%) of PEO in Fig. 4b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conspicuous that the absorbance value exhibits increment as the filler concentration was increased, which is strong evidence of the influence of filler on enhancing the absorbance. The very low absorbance of the pristine membrane is a powerful indication of the high transmittance of the PVDF/PEO membrane asserting the high purity of the membrane 56 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very low absorbance of the pristine membrane is a powerful indication of the high transmittance of the PVDF/PEO membrane asserting the high purity of the membrane. 56 The quantified information of optical transition inside the investigated membranes can be evaluated by the absorption coefficient (α) and Tauc's formula by the following equations 57 :…”
Section: Composition and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%