2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization of glasses – When to use the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami kinetics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The α max,z values for the present IMC crystallization data are shown in Figure 5 B. The mean α max,z values (averaged over the whole range of q + ) show reasonable correspondence with the 0.632 fingerprint of the JMA model (the 0.999 correlation [ 49 ] with the JMA model is indicated by the dashed lines). This highlights, however, the danger of averaging data exhibiting significant trends.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The α max,z values for the present IMC crystallization data are shown in Figure 5 B. The mean α max,z values (averaged over the whole range of q + ) show reasonable correspondence with the 0.632 fingerprint of the JMA model (the 0.999 correlation [ 49 ] with the JMA model is indicated by the dashed lines). This highlights, however, the danger of averaging data exhibiting significant trends.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The KJMA model is based on the kinetics of crystallization controlled by the nucleation and growth of crystal domains and is valid for an isotropic crystallization with randomly dispersed nuclei and with growth rate dependent only on temperature, as discussed in refs , , . The time evolution of crystallinity ϕ is described in terms of an apparent crystallinity ϕ 0 of virtually overlapped domains under the concept of an extended volume , where I ( T , t ) denotes a nucleation rate per unit volume, g represents a geometric factor, G ( T ) is the growth rate, and d denotes the dimension of crystal domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,47 The JMA theory can be extended to nonisothermal conditions only in cases where the nucleation centers can be shown to form before or during the initial stages of crystal growth and where the crystal growth rate can be considered Arrhenian in the determined temperature range of crystallization. 30,48,49 The former condition is supported for the SNPB glass through in situ microscopy (described later), whereas Arrhenian growth can be assumed for measurement in the relatively narrow temperature window 49 (i.e., ∼ 373−393 K) over which the activation energy remains nominally constant during the glass-crystal transformation process. 30 Both conditions for use of the nonisothermal approach appear to be satisfied, as shown by the experimental results discussed below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there are practical limitations in experimentally obtaining a suitable exothermic crystallization curve during an isothermal hold step in a calorimetric experiment (e.g., see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information for the case of data collected for the current SNPB hybrid material), thus suggesting the need for nonisothermal methods. Nonisothermal methods have added advantages, as they are (i) time efficient (no need to equilibrate at each temperature), (ii) not subject to potential temperature over/under-shoot and oscillation during the process of rapid ramp to the isothermal temperature, and, (iii) able to measure phase transformations that occur too rapidly to be measured under isothermal conditions. , The JMA theory can be extended to nonisothermal conditions only in cases where the nucleation centers can be shown to form before or during the initial stages of crystal growth and where the crystal growth rate can be considered Arrhenian in the determined temperature range of crystallization. ,, The former condition is supported for the SNPB glass through in situ microscopy (described later), whereas Arrhenian growth can be assumed for measurement in the relatively narrow temperature window (i.e., ∼ 373–393 K) over which the activation energy remains nominally constant during the glass-crystal transformation process . Both conditions for use of the nonisothermal approach appear to be satisfied, as shown by the experimental results discussed below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%