1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19990124)71:4<579::aid-app9>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization regimes and reptation in polypropylene molecular weight fractions

Abstract: Crystal growth rate data based on the kinetic nucleation theory of chain folding and the effect of reptation, have been used to predict the rate of crystal growth at moderate to high supercoolings in iPP molecular weight fractions. Growth rate data obtained for the fractions seem to be in agreement with the theoretical predictions of the regime theory. However, an extension of the gambler ruin treatment to the iPP data has not been successful with regard to the dominant morphology in regime II. The variable cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the kinetic theory of crystallization [58–60], independent of the type of regime, the crystallization rate G can be given by: where K g(III) = 4 σ u σ e b 0 T m0 / k Δ H m for Regime III [61–64], k being the Boltzmann constant, 1.38 × 10 −26 kJ K −1 , b 0 = 6.26 Å, represents the thickness of a crystalline monolayer added during growth, σ e and σ u are the basal and lateral interfacial free energies of the crystallite, respectively, and U /2.3 R(T c ‐ T ∞ ) represents the transport term through the liquid–crystal interface at the crystallization temperature T c [65]. The temperature T ∞ is that at which the viscosity of the system is infinite, and is equivalent to the value T g ‐ 30 which is 231.1 K for polypropylene.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In agreement with the kinetic theory of crystallization [58–60], independent of the type of regime, the crystallization rate G can be given by: where K g(III) = 4 σ u σ e b 0 T m0 / k Δ H m for Regime III [61–64], k being the Boltzmann constant, 1.38 × 10 −26 kJ K −1 , b 0 = 6.26 Å, represents the thickness of a crystalline monolayer added during growth, σ e and σ u are the basal and lateral interfacial free energies of the crystallite, respectively, and U /2.3 R(T c ‐ T ∞ ) represents the transport term through the liquid–crystal interface at the crystallization temperature T c [65]. The temperature T ∞ is that at which the viscosity of the system is infinite, and is equivalent to the value T g ‐ 30 which is 231.1 K for polypropylene.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…should be two times higher for Regime III than for Regime II. Experimental values are different, in range of 1.4–2.6 or even more, as 3.2 found by Ibhadon (see Fig. in his paper).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The properties of impact polypropylenes, including ESCR, can also be related to the size and distribution of the rubbery component [34][35][36]. The optimum size of the rubber particles and the distance between these particles could be one of the most important factors in controlling the mechanical behaviour of polymers, but there is some debate as to what the optimum values for these variables are, but values of around 0.3-0.4 mm are generally reported [35].…”
Section: Stress Crack Resistance: Bulk Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%