2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallographic analysis of lenticular martensite in Fe–1.0C–17Cr stainless steel by electron backscatter diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue was apparently involved with plastic deformation in the austenite to accommodate the shape strain of martensite during the course of transformation. 41 It is not the objective of the present research to further study this related aspect, and hereafter, the K–S OR is employed. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue was apparently involved with plastic deformation in the austenite to accommodate the shape strain of martensite during the course of transformation. 41 It is not the objective of the present research to further study this related aspect, and hereafter, the K–S OR is employed. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum C2 aperture was chosen such that the convergence angle (2α) was about 33 mrad and the probe size was around 1 nm. The convergence condition was the same as that in a previous study (Chang, Chen, Tsai, & Yang, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the hardness of (FeCr) 3 C and Cr 7 C 3 was higher than that of Fe 3 C, which was more likely to bring uneven slip or microcracks in the surrounding. Due to the different slip coefficients of the crystal grains in different directions, the slip could not be extended over one direction and the displacement of the crystal grains was accumulated at the front of the grain boundary, resulting in high stress concentration and subsequently leaving a tortuous area of deformation on the specimen surface [21,22]. It should be noted that the largest size of crack of samples was measured about 3.43, 3.64, 8.33 µm achieved with the tempering temperatures of 180, 400, and 620 • C, respectively.…”
Section: Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%