2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-020-07632-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CS-CGMP: Clustering Scheme Using Canada Geese Migration Principle for Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation experiments of the proposed approach were conducted to validate the performance of data reduction strategy DR-NAP; it has been implanted in GSA-based clustering routing strategy (GSA-CRS) 31 and clustering scheme using Canada Geese Migration Principle (CS-CGMP). 51 The obtained results of the proposed approaches were compared with the above-mentioned approaches which have no data reduction strategy. WSN scenario given in Intel Berkeley Research Lab 50 has been used for simulation as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation experiments of the proposed approach were conducted to validate the performance of data reduction strategy DR-NAP; it has been implanted in GSA-based clustering routing strategy (GSA-CRS) 31 and clustering scheme using Canada Geese Migration Principle (CS-CGMP). 51 The obtained results of the proposed approaches were compared with the above-mentioned approaches which have no data reduction strategy. WSN scenario given in Intel Berkeley Research Lab 50 has been used for simulation as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equation (11), the hop (u, v) with the minimum value of the fitness function is regarded as the final traffic load transfer path. In equation ( 12), the constraint C 0 .…”
Section: Intersegment Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The first type is hybrid transmission, such as Wang and colleagues, 8,9 in which sensor nodes have two data transmitting modes: (1) single-hop (SH) transmission, in which every node sends data to the sink by an one-hop way and does not need any relay node; and (2) multiple-hop (MH) transmission, in which most packets are sent to the destination by a relay way, that is, at least two hops of data delivery. The second type is power control, such as Zhang et al, 10 Kavitha et al, 11 and Lai et al, 12 in which sensor nodes with less data delivery tasks use shorter communication range while the reverse is performed for those with more data delivery tasks. The third type is multifactor routing, such as Liu et al, 13 Peng et al, 14 and Qin et al, 15 in which data delivery paths are determined according to some key factors, for example, the remaining energy of nodes, the distance between two nodes, and the density distribution of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those cluster heads having lower residual energy is rotated with cluster heads having high energy. This ensures that the energy consumption is uniform, and the lifetime of the nodes can be extended as all the nodes bear the same energy in themselves [18]. Sundar Rajina et al [11] suggested that network operations be managed using a load saver system with a opportunistic energy-efficient routing with load balancing (OE2-LB) that eliminates data collection delays and avoids data collection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%