2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSF biomarkers in neurodegenerative and vascular dementias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 334 publications
(360 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,30,37 Clinical treatment for pre-clinical declines in cognition would be strengthened by effective biomarkers of dementia; this expanding area of research could also lead to longitudinal testing improvements in epidemiologic risk factor identification. 3840 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,30,37 Clinical treatment for pre-clinical declines in cognition would be strengthened by effective biomarkers of dementia; this expanding area of research could also lead to longitudinal testing improvements in epidemiologic risk factor identification. 3840 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is little doubt that analysing biomarkers improves AD diagnostic accuracy and may in future be markers of disease progression or outcome targets for clinical trials. There is a large number of potential biomarkers which represent neurodegeneration, amyloid precursor protein metabolism, tangle pathology, blood-brain-barrier function or glial activation due to inflammation (286). However, results tend to be from highly selected populations, that even a meta-analysis of many studies may produce overly optimistic performance results.…”
Section: Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early identification of WMH-CIND plays a vital role in the prevention of the onset and progression of CI and dementia. Several diagnostic approaches and potential detection methods have been developed (Van Maurik et al, 2017), including standard neuropsychological tests (Bai et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2010), neuroimaging markers (structural MRI markers, including those for hippocampal atrophy, ventricular volume and whole brain atrophy) and PET-CT markers (Nettiksimmons et al, 2010;Arbizu et al, 2018;Caminiti et al, 2018), electrophysiological tests (Imperatori et al, 2019) and biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (P-tau, tau, Aβ peptides, and Aβ42/P-tau ratio) (Van Harten et al, 2011;Llorens et al, 2016), with their respective strengths and weaknesses, as well as different prognostic accuracies and specificities. In recent years, resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) and diffusion MR markers have been increasingly used in the investigation of new markers of CI (Franzmeier et al, 2017).…”
Section: Clustering Analysis Based On Support Vector Machine and Automentioning
confidence: 99%