T o many neurochemists the conundrum of schizophrenia constitutes the most fascinating and challenging of all applied problems in neuroscience research. The term schizophrenia encompasses a syndrome of psychotic illnesses that devastate the afflicted patient and his family over a lifetime. The complete disintegration of an intact personality in a physically healthy individual, usually in early adulthood and with no insight, makes the condition the most distressing of all the serious mental disorders. It is also among the most common, with a prevalence of nearly 1% in the population and an incidence of new cases of 1 per 10,000 per year (Hare, 1982).The idea that biochemical abnormalities underlie the aetiology and symptomatology of schizophrenia has waxed and waned over more than half a century. These fluctuations in fashion reflected the old nature and nuture controversy, which most workers now dismiss as irrelevant. The modern consensus accepts that the syndrome arises from the interaction, to varying degrees, of both biological and environmental factors; t o those active in the field therefore, it is an article of faith that aetiological factors of a biochemical nature will eventually be discovered. In the search for these factors, however, numerous problems of interpretation and research strategy arise. The more obvious include the extent to which observed abnormalities may be of aetiological significance, rather than state-dependent; the influence of iatrogenic factors such as drugs or of other uncontrolled environmental factors such as diet: the question of the criteria used by clinicians to diagnose schizophrenia (although this is now a less serious problem than it used to be); and the relevance of peripheral body fluid parameters to a condition that is clearly a disorder of the CNS. These problems have often been considered in detail (e.g., Kety, 1978;Rodnight, 1980) and must be constantly borne in mind when assessing the research discussed below.