CSI/IHRS practice guidelines on follow-up of patients with permanent pacemakers

Rajgopal, Sriram; Kapoor, Aditya; Bajaj, Rajiv; Vora, Amit; Sethi, K K; Sinha, Nakul; Narasimhan, Calambur; Dwivedi, Sudhanshu Kumar; Lokhandwala, Yash

doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2012.11.002

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cardiovascular diseases like heart failure (HF) and cardiac arrhythmias (CA) form a major component of the non-communicable disease burden in the Indian population 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Approximately 40,000–50,000 CA/HF patients receive interventional device therapies like pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) annually in India 8, 9, 10. However, there is very limited published information that systematically profiles Indian HF and CA patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Approximately 40,000–50,000 CA/HF patients receive interventional device therapies like pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) annually in India. 8 , 9 , 10 However, there is very limited published information that systematically profiles Indian HF and CA patients. There is virtually no insight into the diagnostic and interventional treatment access process for these patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Profiling cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure patients in India: The Pan-arrhythmia and Heart Failure Observational Study

Vora

Naik

Lokhandwala³

et al. 2017

Indian Heart Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Profiling cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure patients in India: The Pan-arrhythmia and Heart Failure Observational Study

Vora

Naik

Lokhandwala³

et al. 2017

Indian Heart Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However in majority of places in India, pacemakerpatients are usually checked only once each yearor/and often only near the end of battery life. 10 According to Timby and Smith (2010), Permanent pacemakers improve quality of life and prevent death. Maximum outcome after PPI (permanent pacemaker implantation) can only be attained if patients remain in lifelong compliance with pacemaker care practices.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Effectiveness of Permanent Pacemaker Care Guidelines on Patient Activity and Adherence.

Sharma¹,

Shruti²,

SinghN³

et al. 2018

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The objectives of present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Pacemaker Care Guidelines on pacemaker care practices adherence and performance in activities of daily living in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. Material and methods: A quasi experimental design was considered for the present study. Total 100 samples were taken (50 in each control and experimental group) from cardiology units of Advance Cardiac Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh by total enumeration sampling. Pacemaker Care Guidelines were developed and taught to experimental group with routine care and only routine care was given to control group. Tools used were sociodemographic profile, personal profile, clinical profile, Barthel Index for ADL and pacemaker care practices adherence checklist. Interview schedule and observation method was used for assessment of outcome variables at pre pacemaker implantation, 1 st ,5 th , 10 th post implantation day and after 1month and 2 month of pacemaker implantation. Results: The present study revealed that 94% patients in experimental group exhibited good adherence with pacemaker care practices as in control group average adherence was seen in 90% patients with statistically significant difference (p value <0.01). whereas ,in term of performance of activities of daily living, the Barthel score was 19.80±0.40 (range 18-20) in experimental group and in control group the Mean Barthel score was 16.43±1.92 (range 11-18) at 2 month of post Pacemaker implantation was seen with statistically significant improvement in ADL in experimental group (p value <0.05) Conclusion: In the present study, Pacemaker Care Guidelines were found effective in term of increasing adherence with pacemaker care practices and increasing independence in activities of daily living. Therefore such nursing guidelines should be taught to patients to improve pacemaker care and reduce the pacemaker related complications due to non-adherence.

show abstract

Impact of right ventricular lead position on left ventricular functions and early remodeling in permanent single- and dual-chamber pacemakers

Ali

Hawas

Ramadan

et al. 2022

Herzschr Elektrophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CSI/IHRS practice guidelines on follow-up of patients with permanent pacemakers

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

Profiling cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure patients in India: The Pan-arrhythmia and Heart Failure Observational Study

Profiling cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure patients in India: The Pan-arrhythmia and Heart Failure Observational Study

Assessment of Effectiveness of Permanent Pacemaker Care Guidelines on Patient Activity and Adherence.

Impact of right ventricular lead position on left ventricular functions and early remodeling in permanent single- and dual-chamber pacemakers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About