2022
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2022.2123886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CST/Polα/primase-mediated fill-in synthesis at DSBs

Abstract: DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a major threat to the genome, so the efficient repair of such breaks is essential. DSB processing and repair is affected by 53BP1, which has been proposed to determine repair pathway choice and/or promote repair fidelity. 53BP1 and its downstream effectors, RIF1 and shieldin, control 3’ overhang length, and the mechanism has been a topic of intensive research. Here, we highlight recent evidence that 3’ overhang control by 53BP1 occurs through fill-in synthesis of resected D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most reasonable explanation is that telomerase, freed from its inhibition by CST, generates very long overhangs in POT1b KO cells. These extended overhangs may overwhelm the ability of POT1a to block ATR kinase signaling, leading to ATR- and 53BP1-dependent recruitment of CST–Polα/Primase, similar to what happens at resected DSBs or telomeres lacking both POT1a and POT1b ( Mirman et al 2018 , 2023 ; Mirman and de Lange 2020 ). This DDR-dependent loading and fill-in by CST–Polα/Primase likely mitigates C-strand loss (and dampens further ATR signaling) and thus promotes the viability of POT1b KO mice expressing telomerase.…”
Section: C-strand Maintenance By Cst–polα/primasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most reasonable explanation is that telomerase, freed from its inhibition by CST, generates very long overhangs in POT1b KO cells. These extended overhangs may overwhelm the ability of POT1a to block ATR kinase signaling, leading to ATR- and 53BP1-dependent recruitment of CST–Polα/Primase, similar to what happens at resected DSBs or telomeres lacking both POT1a and POT1b ( Mirman et al 2018 , 2023 ; Mirman and de Lange 2020 ). This DDR-dependent loading and fill-in by CST–Polα/Primase likely mitigates C-strand loss (and dampens further ATR signaling) and thus promotes the viability of POT1b KO mice expressing telomerase.…”
Section: C-strand Maintenance By Cst–polα/primasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The AF2 analysis predicted two points of interaction between shieldin and CST: SHLD1-CTC1 (Fig 1B panel vi) and SHLD2-CTC1 (Fig 1B panel v). The predicted SHLD1-CTC1 interaction has been previously described (Mirman et al, 2022a) and disrupting this interface by mutating SHLD1 leucine 20 that is buried within the binding surface ablates this interaction (Mirman et al, 2022b). Our AF2 analysis also predicts an interaction between the third SHLD2 OB-fold with CTC1 that is compatible with SHLD1-SHLD2 binding (Fig 1B panel v), though this region is not sufficient for interaction in yeast-two-hybrid assays (Mirman et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Shieldin is known to interact with the CST complex that facilitates fill-in of resected DNA by Polymerase α-primase (Mirman et al, 2022a). The AF2 analysis predicted two points of interaction between shieldin and CST: SHLD1-CTC1 (Fig 1B panel vi) and SHLD2-CTC1 (Fig 1B panel v).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shieldin is known to interact with the CST complex that facilitates the fill‐in of resected DNA by Pol α‐Primase (Mirman et al , 2022a ). The AF2 analysis predicted two points of interaction between shieldin and CST: SHLD1‐CTC1 (Fig 1B panel vii, Appendix Fig S2 B) and SHLD2‐CTC1 (Fig 1B panel v).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%