2007
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/79274414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT and MRI in fat-containing papillary renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: We present a case, pathologically proven, of a patient with multiple papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) with bilateral and synchronous affectation. CT showed fatty tissue inside one of the lesions and numerous calcified lesions. The study with MR demonstrated multiple and hypointense lesions in T2 and contrast enhancement in T1. Our observations confirm that the presence of multiple lesions with fat and calcified deposits and poor contrast enhancement should be diagnosed as PRCC, rather than renal clear cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some RCC can contain calcifications, and MRI may not detect them. [ 31 ] Press et al . mentioned in their article that the overall diagnostic utility of ultrasonography (US) is questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some RCC can contain calcifications, and MRI may not detect them. [ 31 ] Press et al . mentioned in their article that the overall diagnostic utility of ultrasonography (US) is questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All reported cases of fat-containing RCC contain small foci of fat scattered within a soft-tissue mass (33)(34)(35) and can be readily differentiated from classic AML, which usually contains abundant macroscopic fat. Most fat-containing RCCs contain calcifications in close proximity to fat foci (Fig 13).…”
Section: Renal Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitfall : Malignant renal neoplasms , including clear cell and papillary carcinoma , have been noted to rarely contain gross or " macroscopic " fat (D'Angelo et al 2002 ;Garin et al 2007 ). In these instances, although exceedingly rare, imaging differentiation from AML is very challenging.…”
Section: Angiomyolipoma and Mimicsmentioning
confidence: 99%