1990
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.1.2112867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT density of mesenteric, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous fat in cirrhotic patients: comparison with control subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No imaging of the brain before the traumatic event was presented. The mean density of retroperitoneal fat in a healthy subject has been shown to be 2118 HU [9], which corresponds to the density of the fat globules in our patient. Fat in the subarachnoid space will generally be situated in non-dependent sites, as fat is less dense than cerebrospinal fluid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…No imaging of the brain before the traumatic event was presented. The mean density of retroperitoneal fat in a healthy subject has been shown to be 2118 HU [9], which corresponds to the density of the fat globules in our patient. Fat in the subarachnoid space will generally be situated in non-dependent sites, as fat is less dense than cerebrospinal fluid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In that study, mean attenuation of mesenteric fat was higher than that of retroperitoneal and subcutaneous depots. 10 Further, Hu et al 11 observed higher attenuation values in brown compared to white adipose tissue. More recently, Fox et al 12 examined associations between SAT and VAT attenuation values and cardiometabolic risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using this scale, most soft tissues are characterized by positive HUs while adipose tissue attenuation is located in the negative range. 9 In 1990, Tyrrel et al 10 compared mean adipose tissue attenuation between patients with and without cirrhosis and found that patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis were characterized by higher fat attenuation compared to controls. In that study, mean attenuation of mesenteric fat was higher than that of retroperitoneal and subcutaneous depots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, hypoalbuminaemia and decreased aldosterone catabolism due to the underlying liver dysfunction leads to a state of persistent fluid overload ( Figure 17). 66, 67 Tyrrel et al 67 compared the CT densities of mesenteric, retroperitoneal and subcutaneous fat in patients with and without liver cirrhosis and found a visually evident and statistically significant increase in the density of mesenteric fat in patients with cirrhosis. The increase in density was also seen in the retroperitoneal and subcutaneous fat (Figure 18), although the difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Muscle Wasting or Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%