2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Derived Hounsfield Unit: An Easy Way to Determine Osteoporosis and Radiation Related Fracture Risk in Irradiated Patients

Abstract: Background: We aimed to evaluate osteoporosis, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in irradiated patients by computerized tomography derived Hounsfield Units (HUs) calculated from radiation treatment planning system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bone density is high, usually 300~3000HU [18]. Many studies have shown a good correlation between HU value and T score [8][9][10][18][19][20].Similarly, the M-score was the rst MRI-based observation to use adipose tissue with high T1 signal and to assess fat in ltration in cancellous bone by measuring T1 signal in the vertebral body [21].Other study has con rmed this approach and provided evidence for the use of m-scores to assess bone quality [22].However, M-Score is of limited utility because it requires measurements to be taken using the same MRI machine.Using the principle of M-score and avoiding its defects, VBQ score was developed [11]. VBQ score was standardized with L3 space CSF SI as a reference value and could be compared between patients with different MRI machines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone density is high, usually 300~3000HU [18]. Many studies have shown a good correlation between HU value and T score [8][9][10][18][19][20].Similarly, the M-score was the rst MRI-based observation to use adipose tissue with high T1 signal and to assess fat in ltration in cancellous bone by measuring T1 signal in the vertebral body [21].Other study has con rmed this approach and provided evidence for the use of m-scores to assess bone quality [22].However, M-Score is of limited utility because it requires measurements to be taken using the same MRI machine.Using the principle of M-score and avoiding its defects, VBQ score was developed [11]. VBQ score was standardized with L3 space CSF SI as a reference value and could be compared between patients with different MRI machines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is performed at the L1-L4 vertebral levels and an average obtained (Figure 3). Yaprak et al 14 demonstrated a significant correlation between low HU values and a diagnosis of osteoporosis and suggested a cutoff of less than 100 HU for diagnosis.…”
Section: Quantitative Ct Scan and Hounsfield Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been shown that patients with decreased BMD and osteoporosis may be identified based on CT-derived bony HU determinations [25,26]. Osteopenia is defined as values of 100-160 HU, whereas values < 100 are considered osteoporotic [25][26][27][28]. The risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) is increased in patients at HU < 160 [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteopenia is defined as values of 100-160 HU, whereas values < 100 are considered osteoporotic [25][26][27][28]. The risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) is increased in patients at HU < 160 [28,29]. Obesity and adipose tissue are linked to sarcopenic fatty muscle degeneration and bone health through various pathways [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%