2022
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Diagnosis of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Image Analysis/Processing Hemorrhagic markers were assessed on T 2 *-weighted images. Lobar microbleeds (location as described by the Boston criteria 28 ) were defined and scored, as described previously. 29 ICHs were defined as parenchymal defects with evidence of hemosiderin in their wall.…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Image Analysis/Processing Hemorrhagic markers were assessed on T 2 *-weighted images. Lobar microbleeds (location as described by the Boston criteria 28 ) were defined and scored, as described previously. 29 ICHs were defined as parenchymal defects with evidence of hemosiderin in their wall.…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, the findings by Grangeon et al 7 on the diagnostic yield of each of the extensive MRI marker panel, and data on current CAA-ri diagnostic criteria accuracy, perhaps not serendipitously, are in line with the pragmatic diagnostic approach that other colleagues and I are using in routine practice when suspecting CAA-ri—one that often deviates from previously suggested criteria. The Table operationalizes this pragmatic diagnostic framework and revised criteria for CAA-ri intergrading most up to date imaging markers, as informed by the study of Grangeon et al 7 The intriguing role of inflammation in sporadic CAA more broadly remains a topic of ongoing investigation. 10…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A study by Grangeon et al 7 published in this issue of Neurology ® is timely because it addresses some fundamental gaps in CAA-ri diagnostics. In a retrospective study across 23 French centers, they compared a CAA-ri patient cohort (n = 104, pathologically proven or probable) with a cohort of patients with biopsy-positive primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS, a CAA-ri differential) (n = 52).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%