1995
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT findings in bronchiectasis: limited value in distinguishing between idiopathic and specific types.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
208
1
10

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
208
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the good interobserver agreement for the CT features of bronchiectasis previously published [12][13][14], CTs were evaluated by a single experienced cardiothoracic radiologist.…”
Section: Sputum Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the good interobserver agreement for the CT features of bronchiectasis previously published [12][13][14], CTs were evaluated by a single experienced cardiothoracic radiologist.…”
Section: Sputum Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of bronchiectasis was defined using established criteria [15,16]. The severity of bronchial dilatation (0: normal; 1: 1-26dia-meter of adjacent artery; 2: 2-36diameter of adjacent artery; 3: .36diameter of adjacent artery), and of bronchial wall thickening (0: normal; 1: ,0.56diameter of adjacent artery; 2: 0.5-16diameter of adjacent artery; 3: .16diameter of adjacent artery) was scored for each lobe using previously described criteria [14,17]. The extent of bronchiectasis [11], mucus plugging [18], sacculations/abscesses [11], mosaic perfusion [18] and collapse or consolidation were assessed on a lobar basis and the number of segments involved recorded.…”
Section: Sputum Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a simple radiological classification system to evaluate the severity of disease on HRCT. This score has limitations, as it only takes into account the number of lobes involved and the degree of dilatation (15). This score has been widely used in studies of non-CF bronchiectasis but takes into account far fewer variables than scoring systems used in CF, such as the Bhalla score (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum score is 18 and minimum score is 1. This score has been used previously in studies of bronchiectasis (13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Radiological Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, atypical mycobacteria may favour the right middle lobe and the lingula 45. Despite identification of these key features on CT and extensive testing, no underlying aetiology is found in a large proportion of patients with bronchiectasis 46. The prevalence of idiopathic bronchiectasis varies amongst cohorts (32%‐66%) likely owing to geographic variations, diagnostic algorithms and other determinants 30, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%