2012
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Safety, Technique, and Radiation Dose Parameters

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Cervical epidural steroid injections are approached with trepidation because of concerns over safety, including direct spinal cord injury. CT fluoroscopy is an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy that could potentially help reduce the risk of injury by providing improved localization of the needle tip. We sought to determine rates of technical success and risk of complications in our initial cohort of patients treated with cervical interlaminar ESI performed under CTF guidance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single case of thecal sac penetration was identified, which had occurred during an injection at the C5–C6 level. [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single case of thecal sac penetration was identified, which had occurred during an injection at the C5–C6 level. [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a procedure time of approximately 5 minutes, which seems very fast. In literature there is a wide range of procedure times reported for CSNRB, ranging from 6 to 19 minutes for CT fluoroscopy-guided techniques [35], [37]. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to compare procedure times with this trial, as it surely was performed in an ex-vivo lamb model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CLO view (vs. lateral view) may provide more clarity and thus better safety in terms of gauging needle tip depth (relative to posterior epidural space and spinal cord) . CT guidance is advantageous for high‐level access, with less risk of complications . The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate technical success and procedural risk in patients subjected to image‐guided CESI, comparing CT, c‐arm fluoroscopy CLO, and c‐arm fluoroscopy APL approaches to visualization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Generally it is believed that accidental injection of the particle steroid into the radicular artery and/or spasm of the radicular artery caused the infarction of the spinal cord. 4,5 The major technical difficulty of performing a CESI is that most of the times it is difficult to see the Tuohy needle tip in the cervical epidural space, [6][7][8] and sometimes even the contrast, in a lateral fluoroscopic view (Fig. Cases of direct injection into the cervical spinal cord and subsequent paralysis have been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%