2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT-guided sacroiliac percutaneous screw placement in unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries: Accuracy of screw position, injury reduction and complications in 71 patients with 136 screws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Those studies concluded that, since fluoroscopic-guided closed reduction and lag screw fixation of sacroiliac luxations restored and maintained pelvic canal dimensions, MIO could be considered as an alternative to ORIF. A potential advantage of MIO is that it may improve drilling accuracy, thus allowing optimal screw orientation and purchase in the sacral body (16,18,19). Preventing inadvertent infraction of the vertebral canal or the seventh lumbar (L7)-first sacral (S1) intervertebral disc space could also reduce postoperative morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies concluded that, since fluoroscopic-guided closed reduction and lag screw fixation of sacroiliac luxations restored and maintained pelvic canal dimensions, MIO could be considered as an alternative to ORIF. A potential advantage of MIO is that it may improve drilling accuracy, thus allowing optimal screw orientation and purchase in the sacral body (16,18,19). Preventing inadvertent infraction of the vertebral canal or the seventh lumbar (L7)-first sacral (S1) intervertebral disc space could also reduce postoperative morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 3D fluoroscopic navigation when performing pelvic surgery is reported to be useful in evaluating screw position. The above disadvantages could be reduced with 2D-or 3D-fluoroscopic navigation, but the malposition rate of screw fixation for pelvic fractures ranges from 0-31%, demonstrating that there's still certain room to improve the technology [29][30][31] . What's more, too much radiation exposure to patients and surgeons will also cause great harm to their bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties, new methods of CT and computer-assisted navigation screw fixation techniques are continuously being developed and introduced. [7,8,22,23] However; high costs, low utility, and rare availability of CT and computer navigation-assisted techniques lead to significantly infrequent use of these techniques. Therefore, the iliosacral screw fixation technique performed under fluoroscopy guidance is currently the most commonly used method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Furthermore, several studies have reported a number of deficiencies in the description of these techniques. [7,8] Today, fluoroscopy and conventional radiographs are still the most commonly used preoperative imaging methods to perform percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation compared to the use of CT and other computer-assisted techniques. In this study, we aimed to investigate if pelvic mapping is applicable in iliosacral screw fixation to determine screw entry point and screw trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%