2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02236-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT imaging, classification, and complications of acute pancreatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that in the acute phase of acute pancreatitis, even within 72 hours of symptom onset, CT scan is not superior to the clinical scoring system. This is because imaging may underestimate the extent or severity of pancreatic/peripancreatic necrosis [4,21]. Typical CT features were found in 10 patients in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It has been reported that in the acute phase of acute pancreatitis, even within 72 hours of symptom onset, CT scan is not superior to the clinical scoring system. This is because imaging may underestimate the extent or severity of pancreatic/peripancreatic necrosis [4,21]. Typical CT features were found in 10 patients in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Nonionic intravenous contrast material was injected at a bolus of 3–5 mL/s with a total volume of 100–120 ml before scanning. All patients underwent unenhanced imaging followed by arterial phase (25–30 s) and venous phase (60 s) imaging after infusion of contrast material [ 9 ]. Encapsulation was defined as a continuous enhancing wall around peripancreatic fluid/necrosis collections on CECT ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular complications occur in approximately 25% cases with AP. 3 The vascular complications occurring could be arterial or venous. Arterial complications include PSA, active extravasation, arteritis, and arterial fistula.…”
Section: Summary Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%