2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT imaging of bone and bone marrow infiltration in malignant melanoma—Challenges and limitations for clinical staging in comparison to 18FDG-PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the significant challenges with FDG‐PET/CT is the false‐positive finding that can result from increased FDG uptake by inflammatory processes, which is an issue, because immunotherapy elicits a natural inflammatory response, and immune‐related adverse events also may demonstrate increased FDG uptake. Two studies in patients with melanoma demonstrated the inability of FDG‐PET/CT to differentiate between patients who had pseudoprogression because of inflammatory infiltrate and those who had actual PD . Cho et al evaluated the ability of FDG‐PET/CT in conjunction with other imaging modalities to predict early response to therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who receive treatment with several checkpoint inhibitors .…”
Section: Implementation Of Response Criteria In Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the significant challenges with FDG‐PET/CT is the false‐positive finding that can result from increased FDG uptake by inflammatory processes, which is an issue, because immunotherapy elicits a natural inflammatory response, and immune‐related adverse events also may demonstrate increased FDG uptake. Two studies in patients with melanoma demonstrated the inability of FDG‐PET/CT to differentiate between patients who had pseudoprogression because of inflammatory infiltrate and those who had actual PD . Cho et al evaluated the ability of FDG‐PET/CT in conjunction with other imaging modalities to predict early response to therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who receive treatment with several checkpoint inhibitors .…”
Section: Implementation Of Response Criteria In Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies in patients with melanoma demonstrated the inability of FDG-PET/CT to differentiate between patients who had pseudoprogression because of inflammatory infiltrate and those who had actual PD. 15,16 Cho et al evaluated the ability of FDG-PET/CT in conjunction with other imaging modalities to predict early response to therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who receive treatment with several checkpoint inhibitors. 17 At each post-treatment time point, response was assessed based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST 1.0), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.…”
Section: Immunotherapy and The Role Of Imaging/carter Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only very limited data are available for the evaluation of immunotherapy by means of 18 F-FDG-PET. Two clinical experiences have been made in 49 patients [6, 7], demonstrating the inability of 18 F-FDG PET/CT make a differential diagnosis between patients with pseudo-progression (due to inflammatory infiltrate) from those with a real progression, during immunotherapy. In fact, it has been reported that the initial increase in tumor size, later followed by tumor volume reduction in part of the patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is due to inflammatory cell infiltrates [2, 6, 7].…”
Section: How To Evaluate the Response To Immunotherapy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have reported that 18 F-FDG-PET/CT can potentially predict early response to PD-1 blockade or CTLA-4 blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer or melanoma 18,19 . However, several studies have also demonstrated the inability of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT to distinguish patients with pseudoprogression from those with progressive disease in melanoma patients 20,21 . Thus, to date, non-invasive imaging approaches to clarify the early response to effective immunotherapy in vivo have not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%