1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0037-198x(88)80039-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT of the adrenal glands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all presumptive diagnoses of pheochromocytoma or carcinoma were histologically proven, while in the remainder the diagnosis of a benign lesion was based on imaging characteristics of the mass as well as on clinical, endocrine and CT follow-up studies. The combination of these methods, in particular the re-evaluation after an interval of at least 12 months, means that a diagnosis of malignancy, either primary or secondary is very unlikely to be missed (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all presumptive diagnoses of pheochromocytoma or carcinoma were histologically proven, while in the remainder the diagnosis of a benign lesion was based on imaging characteristics of the mass as well as on clinical, endocrine and CT follow-up studies. The combination of these methods, in particular the re-evaluation after an interval of at least 12 months, means that a diagnosis of malignancy, either primary or secondary is very unlikely to be missed (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in experienced hands almost 20% of the extra-adrenal PCCs remained undetected using contrast-enhanced CT (49). Extra-adrenal PCCs are multicentric in up to 25% of cases and non-functional ectopic localisations are not exceptional (48).…”
Section: Ectopic and Syndrome-related Pccs And Cat Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and most important issue is to distinguish between malignant (either primary or metastatic) and benign lesions. CT or MR characteristics of the mass are helpful in the differential diagnosis [3][4][5] and the size of the mass is admittedly the most used discriminant for sur gical recommendations. However, the diameter below which silent incidentalomas can be safely presumed to be benign is presently ill-defined [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%