1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT prediction of irresectability in esophageal carcinoma: value of additional patient positions and relation to patient outcome

Abstract: Additional patient positions do not improve the CT prediction of aortic invasion. Predicted resectability correlates with a significant longer life expectancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall accuracy was 95.8 for bronchoscopy and there was a discordance between the results of CT and bronchoscopy of 40. Another study presented by van den Hoed et al in 1997 10 suggested that additional CT scans in the left lateral and prone position might improve spatial resolution. However, the results of the examinations suggested that local assessment is of no benefit in determining the potential invasion of a mass into the tracheobronchial tree.…”
Section: Scanning Protocol For Spiral Ct Of Upper Esophageal Carcinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy was 95.8 for bronchoscopy and there was a discordance between the results of CT and bronchoscopy of 40. Another study presented by van den Hoed et al in 1997 10 suggested that additional CT scans in the left lateral and prone position might improve spatial resolution. However, the results of the examinations suggested that local assessment is of no benefit in determining the potential invasion of a mass into the tracheobronchial tree.…”
Section: Scanning Protocol For Spiral Ct Of Upper Esophageal Carcinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT is used to clarify local invasiveness; however, the image quality varies according to when the scan is performed and the concentration of the intravascular contrast medium. In addition, CT uses spiral acquisitions that are reconstructed using computer software, and, thus, the image does not represent the actual disease status [19,20]. CT image quality has been correlated with injection flow [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%