2016
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20151059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT pulmonary angiography: simultaneous low-pitch dual-source acquisition mode with 70 kVp and 40 ml of contrast medium and comparison with high-pitch spiral dual-source acquisition with automated tube potential selection

Abstract: Cite this article as: Boos J, Kröpil P, Lanzman RS, Aissa J, Schleich C, Heusch P, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: simultaneous low-pitch dual-source acquisition mode with 70 kVp and 40 ml of contrast medium and comparison with high-pitch spiral dual-source acquisition with automated tube potential selection. Br

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTPA is currently the first line imaging technique in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism with high diagnostic yield and low radiation dose. [12][13][14][15][16] High-pitch CTPA is more attractive due to its associated very low radiation dose without affecting image quality and reduction of motion artefacts in cardiorespiratory imaging due to short scanning times and elimination of breathhold, and this is confirmed by some recent reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…CTPA is currently the first line imaging technique in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism with high diagnostic yield and low radiation dose. [12][13][14][15][16] High-pitch CTPA is more attractive due to its associated very low radiation dose without affecting image quality and reduction of motion artefacts in cardiorespiratory imaging due to short scanning times and elimination of breathhold, and this is confirmed by some recent reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The pitch of 0.9 as recommended by this study is consistent with Boos et al who also proposed the 70 kVp and pitch of 0.9 CTPA protocol. [36] We did not include 70 kVp in this study as 100 or 120 kVp is commonly used in CTPA. Further, due to 3D printed model being static instead of having hemodynamic flow features, we did not assess the effect of changing contrast medium volume on image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high radiation dose associated with the increased use of CTPA examinations has raised concerns leading to the paradigm shift of developing optimal CTPA protocols to lower radiation dose while still achieving diagnostic images. Low-dose CTPA protocols have been reported in some studies showing the feasibility of reducing tube voltage to 80 and 70 kVp with use of high pitch values with resultant effective dose of less than 2 mSv (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The main disadvantage of lowering tube voltage during CTPA is associated with increased image noise, with noise further increased when a high pitch protocol is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%