2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT radiomics-based machine learning classification of atypical cartilaginous tumours and appendicular chondrosarcomas

Abstract: Background Clinical management ranges from surveillance or curettage to wide resection for atypical to higher-grade cartilaginous tumours, respectively. Our aim was to investigate the performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based machine learning for classification of atypical cartilaginous tumours and higher-grade chondrosarcomas of long bones. Methods One-hundred-twenty patients with histology-proven lesions were retrospectively included. The training cohort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major concern should be noted that there were too many features involved in their modeling compared to ours (60 vs. 14). The most convincing method to identify whether the trained model is overfitted is externally testing it on unseen data obtained from another institution [ 29 , 30 ]. The results of our external test suggest there was a moderate overfitting in our models, even if only 14 features were used as classifier inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major concern should be noted that there were too many features involved in their modeling compared to ours (60 vs. 14). The most convincing method to identify whether the trained model is overfitted is externally testing it on unseen data obtained from another institution [ 29 , 30 ]. The results of our external test suggest there was a moderate overfitting in our models, even if only 14 features were used as classifier inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate prediction for chondrosarcoma survival is crucial for the counseling, follow-up, and treatment planning of patients. Previous studies have revealed various prognostic factors influencing the survival times of patients with chondrosarcoma, including patient age, tumor size, histological type, tumor grade, and metastasis ( 6 , 19 21 ).. At the same time, increasing amounts of imaging ( 22 , 23 ) and genetic data ( 2 , 24 ) are being mined for survival analysis of chondrosarcoma patients. In the face of high-dimensional data, the limitations of the linear relationship between variables assumed by the classical CoxPH model are evident ( 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the performance of a locally weighted ensemble classifier was evaluated on the test cohort, and was showed to be as good as an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (AUC = 0.78). In agreement with these results, more recently they attempted to develop a machine-learning classifier based on preoperative CT radiomic features to discriminate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcomas of long bones [62]. The CT radiomics-based machine-learning classifier achieved 75% accuracy overall, 81% accuracy in identifying atypical cartilaginous tumors, and 70% accuracy in identifying higher-grade chondrosarcomas, and still there was no difference in comparison with an experienced radiologist (p = 0.75).…”
Section: Bone Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 91%