2000
DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT scanning: patterns of use and dose

Abstract: CT scanning is a relatively high-dose procedure. In spite of the use of magnetic resonance imaging, with faster CT scanners and helical techniques CT is becoming more common. There are few data from practice in the United States regarding the age and sex distribution of patients receiving CT scans, what type of scan and how many scans they receive, or how much radiation dose CT scans contribute. We reviewed over 33,700 consecutive CT examinations done at our institution in 1998 and 1999. Information on the typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
296
4
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 600 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
296
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The original processing time for a full CT scan required up to 9 hours of computer time, but as computer processor speeds have increased and software is refined, processing the large amount of data arriving from the scan has reduced to minutes (Baumrind, 2011;Dawson, 2011). Other advances have included scanners with multiple x-ray emitters and multiple sensors, further reducing the time required for full body scans and the presence of motion artefacts (Mettler et al, 2000).…”
Section: Conventional Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original processing time for a full CT scan required up to 9 hours of computer time, but as computer processor speeds have increased and software is refined, processing the large amount of data arriving from the scan has reduced to minutes (Baumrind, 2011;Dawson, 2011). Other advances have included scanners with multiple x-ray emitters and multiple sensors, further reducing the time required for full body scans and the presence of motion artefacts (Mettler et al, 2000).…”
Section: Conventional Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT has been reported to represent 10% of all studies using ionising radiation, while accounting for two-thirds of the overall radiation dose to patients [18]. The three principal ways of reducing the overall radiation dose from CT in the population include limiting the use of CT scanning to those clinical scenarios where the examination is unequivocally indicated and likely to change patient management, the use, where feasible, of alternative imaging modalities such as ultrasonography and MRI which do not result in exposure to ionising radiation, and when CT is indicated, the use of lowdose CT protocols, which utilise all available CT technology developed for radiation dose optimisation, ensuring that a diagnostic quality CT study is acquired at lowest possible radiation exposure [19].…”
Section: What Can We Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to realize that CT doses are much higher than conventional radiography doses (7,(35)(36)(37)(38), and that the effective dose for a chest CT is approximately 100 -1000 times larger than that for a corresponding chest x-ray examination. Table 1 shows the average effective doses used in 16 common x-ray procedures in 19 western countries, and illustrates that patient doses in CT are much higher than those in most common radiographic examinations (7).…”
Section: How Well Are Ct Doses (And Risks) Understood?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, published frequency data mask the number of times a single patient receives multiple CT examinations (37) and the common practice of multiphase CT scanning, both of which increase the radiation dose (and potential risk) in a cumulative manner (20,39). It has been estimated that 30% of all individuals who undergo CT will be examined at least three times (37).…”
Section: How Well Are Ct Doses (And Risks) Understood?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation