2011
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/99730184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT stroke window settings: an unfortunate misleading misnomer?

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This commentary will discuss the use of the ''stroke window'' settings in the evaluation of CT head examinations and advocate their more widespread use in patients who present with neurological symptoms in addition to patients with suspected stroke. We present examples of the use of stroke windows, which revealed subtle abnormalities that were not readily apparent on default brain window settings and were subsequently confirmed on MRI or follow-up CT. As a result we suggest that stroke windows should… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1, 2, 8, 12, 14, 20] As opposed to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT is relatively rapid, cheap, and widely available. [21, 22] In addition, CT is able to identify most significant intracranial pathologies. Though its resolution is lower than that of MRI, specifically in soft tissue contrast, the use of narrow window width helps to increase the detection of more subtle lesions.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1, 2, 8, 12, 14, 20] As opposed to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT is relatively rapid, cheap, and widely available. [21, 22] In addition, CT is able to identify most significant intracranial pathologies. Though its resolution is lower than that of MRI, specifically in soft tissue contrast, the use of narrow window width helps to increase the detection of more subtle lesions.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though its resolution is lower than that of MRI, specifically in soft tissue contrast, the use of narrow window width helps to increase the detection of more subtle lesions. [22] Non-contrast CT is primarily used to determine the presence of hemorrhagic stroke while simultaneously ruling out neoplasms or other space occupying lesions that may mimic stroke symptoms. [21, 2325] Although the appearance of the ischemic core after infarction is quite specific on non-contrast CT, this modality has only a 45%–70% sensitivity in the hyper-acute period (<6 h), as the associated early changes can be very subtle.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turner and G. Holdsworth (2011) mentions the value of window width and window level used is 40 WW and WL 40 which can be used to improve the diagnosis of subacute ischemic stroke [10]. Meanwhile Charlie Chia-Tsong Hsu (2010) states that the value of the window width and windows at 8 WW and 20 WL level can increase detection sensitivity of acute ischemic stroke with the sensitivity level of 71% of 57% of the normal window settings (80 WW/20 WL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke window is a method of setting the window width and window-level narrow windows which are specifically used to diagnose ischemic stroke [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Using a particular arrangement, the main image of the acute and subacute ischemic stroke can be clearly seen [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the preparation of residents to take call needs to be extensive and focused on perceptual manifestations of neuroradiology in order to have optimal impact (Funaki et al 1997 ). One important maneuver during softcopy viewing on picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstations would be to vary the window width and center level (for stroke, suggest 8 and 32, respectively, rather than the preset "brain" settings of 80 and 20) in order to improve contrast and detection of subtle signs (Lev et al 1999 ;Turner and Holdworth 2011 ) (Fig. 10.3a ).…”
Section: Avoiding Ct Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%