2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CtBP represses Dpp signaling as a dimer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations into the role of assembly in CtBP have investigated the activity of mutants specifically designed to disrupt the CtBP dimer (33)(34)(35)(36). Our results strongly suggest that the CtBP dimer is required for the assembly of a CtBP tetramer formed from the pairing of two CtBP dimers.…”
Section: Assembly Of Tetrameric Ctbpmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous investigations into the role of assembly in CtBP have investigated the activity of mutants specifically designed to disrupt the CtBP dimer (33)(34)(35)(36). Our results strongly suggest that the CtBP dimer is required for the assembly of a CtBP tetramer formed from the pairing of two CtBP dimers.…”
Section: Assembly Of Tetrameric Ctbpmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Regulation of gene expression through the oligomerization of transcriptional factors is an important paradigm (27,28). In the case of CtBP, substantial evidence exists that oligomerization is linked with NAD(H) binding (3, 25, 29 -32), and dimerdestabilizing mutants have been found to inhibit transcriptional function (33)(34)(35)(36). Assembly of CtBP has primarily been considered in terms of dimers, as NADH-bound CtBP crystal structures reveal a predominant dimer with extensive interactions between subunit pairs (23,37,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been established that binding of NAD (H) induces oligomerization and transcriptional activation of CtBP [25,26]. However, there are conflicting hypotheses about the level of oligomerization [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and the relative affinity of binding NADH vs NAD + [33][34][35]. These issues are key to understanding the basis for transcriptional activation of CtBP and also for guiding the design of inhibitors to disrupt transcriptional activity in cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NAD(H) binding to CtBP has been linked to oligomerization and transcriptional activity for nearly two decades [25,26], the level of assembly and the relative affinity of NADH vs NAD + are key issues without consensus at present. Numerous reports have suggested that NAD(H) triggers activation through assembly of CtBP monomers into dimers [27][28][29][30], but others have shown evidence that NAD(H) triggers assembly of dimers into tetramers [31][32][33]. Additionally, published data of the affinity of NADH and NAD + binding to CtBP have led to conflicting conclusions [33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have proposed dimeric CtBP as the relevant oligomeric state (Nardini et al, 2003;Thio et al, 2004;Nardini et al, 2009;Bi et al, 2018;Mani-Telang et al, 2007;Dcona et al, 2019), our studies with multi-angle light scattering and sitedirected mutagenesis have shown that the primary effect of NADH binding is to promote the assembly of two CtBP dimers into tetramers (Bellesis et al, 2018). This was further supported by the observation that CtBP1 and CtBP2 exhibit similar tetrameric assemblies within distinct crystal lattices used for structure determination (Hilbert et al, 2014), resulting in a tetramer model for CtBP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%