2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu(I) complexes – Thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Photophysical approach and material design

Abstract: Cu(I) complexes often show transitions of distinct metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) character. This can lead to small energy separations between the lowest singlet S1 and triplet T1 state. Hence, thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and, if applied to electroluminescent devices, singlet harvesting can become highly effective. In this contribution, we introduce the TADF mechanism and identify crucial parameters that are necessary to optimize materials' properties, in particular, with respect to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
684
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(727 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(402 reference statements)
40
684
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The photoemission characteristics of mononuclear species 9 and 10 are reminiscent of those acquired earlier for their close analogues, [(AuSCN)(Xant-Phos)] [15] and [(AuCN)(tpdp)], [27] respectively ( Figure S9 in the Supporting Information). [27] The radiativel ifetime at 298 Kf or 10 (t r = 5.1 ms) is compatible with thermally activated delayedf luorescenceb ehavior, [38] which has been suggested earlier for a[ Au(dppb)(PS)] complex (PS = 2-diphenylphosphinobenzenethiolate), [37c] and thus, cannotb e Chem. [37] The excited states of 9 and 10 are tentatively associated with a mixture of XLCT (iodide!phosphane) and intraphosphane p!p*C T. In the case of 9,t his assignment allows us to rationalize the blueshifted emission relative to that of [(AuSCN)(Xant-Phos)]( l em = 511nm) due to the effect of ligand X.…”
Section: Synthesis and Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The photoemission characteristics of mononuclear species 9 and 10 are reminiscent of those acquired earlier for their close analogues, [(AuSCN)(Xant-Phos)] [15] and [(AuCN)(tpdp)], [27] respectively ( Figure S9 in the Supporting Information). [27] The radiativel ifetime at 298 Kf or 10 (t r = 5.1 ms) is compatible with thermally activated delayedf luorescenceb ehavior, [38] which has been suggested earlier for a[ Au(dppb)(PS)] complex (PS = 2-diphenylphosphinobenzenethiolate), [37c] and thus, cannotb e Chem. [37] The excited states of 9 and 10 are tentatively associated with a mixture of XLCT (iodide!phosphane) and intraphosphane p!p*C T. In the case of 9,t his assignment allows us to rationalize the blueshifted emission relative to that of [(AuSCN)(Xant-Phos)]( l em = 511nm) due to the effect of ligand X.…”
Section: Synthesis and Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The emission intensity remains constant excluding a thermally activated decay pathway, for example, through the ligand‐field 4 T 2 state (Figures c and S1 in the Supporting Information). Hence, no thermally activated delayed fluorescence through back‐intersystem crossing is operative up to 358 K . This is expected from the huge energy difference between the 2 E and 4 T 2 states in [1] 3+ of more than 85 kJ mol −1 (Figure c) .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The temperature dependence of emission decay time for 2 , τ ( T ) (Figure S16 b), was fitted to Equation describing a three‐state kinetic model (assuming fast process of reaching thermal equilibrium between the T 1 and S 1 states and temperature‐independent decay rates), trueτ()T=3+e-ΔEkBT3τ()T1+1τ()S1e-ΔEkBT …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%