2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu(II) Binding to the Peptide Ala-His-His, a Chimera of the Canonical Cu(II)-Binding Motifs Xxx-His and Xxx-Zzz-His

Abstract: Peptides and proteins with the N-terminal motifs NH-Xxx-His and NH-Xxx-Zzz-His form well-established Cu(II) complexes. The canonical peptides are Gly-His-Lys and Asp-Ala-His-Lys (from the wound healing factor and human serum albumin, respectively). Cu(II) is bound to NH-Xxx-His via three nitrogens from the peptide and an external ligand in the equatorial plane (called 3N form here). In contrast, Cu(II) is bound to NH-Xxx-Zzz-His via four nitrogens from the peptide in the equatorial plane (called 4N form here).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1; Table S1 & 2 for EPR parameters). 15 The addition of Im (Fig. 1b, orange) yielded a spectrum with g// = 2.21(1) and A// 596 MHz, very similar to that of the canonical Cu(GHK) ternary complex with Im 11 , matching the formation of the 3N+N Im complex (for AH see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1; Table S1 & 2 for EPR parameters). 15 The addition of Im (Fig. 1b, orange) yielded a spectrum with g// = 2.21(1) and A// 596 MHz, very similar to that of the canonical Cu(GHK) ternary complex with Im 11 , matching the formation of the 3N+N Im complex (for AH see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This includes their spectroscopic properties, correlated with one different donor atom. 14,15 The time scales of Cu(II) self-exchange reactions are dramatically different: they are slow for XZH (minutes) but fast for XH (< seconds). 16 With respect to redox properties, Cu(II) coordinated to XZH can be oxidized to Cu(III) while Cu(II) in a Cu(XH) complex can be reduced to Cu(I) in the [-1.0,+1.0 V/vs SCE range].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cu‐XZH could not be electrochemically reduced down to −1.0 V vs. NHE . In contrast, Cu II ‐XH complexes cannot be oxidized up to 1.2 V vs. NHE, but can be reduced at a cathodic potential of about −0.2 V vs. NHE . The reduction is electrochemically irreversible leading to two anodic peaks on the reverse scan at about 0.1 and 0.3 V. vs. NHE, corresponding to oxidation of uncoordinated Cu I and of Cu I bound to two His residues, respectively.…”
Section: Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] In contrast, Cu II -XH complexes cannotb eo xidized up to 1.2V vs. NHE, but can be reduced at ac athodic potential of about À0.2 Vv s. NHE. [2,40] The reduction is electrochemically irreversible leadingt ot wo anodic peaks on ther everses can at about 0.1 and 0.3 V. vs. NHE, corresponding to oxidation of uncoordinated Cu I and of Cu I boundt ot wo His residues, respectively.I nt he presence of more than one His or with an exogenous imidazole source,t he first cathodic peak is no more observed. The electrochemical properties of both systemsa re summarized in Figure3,i n which they are compared with the chemical redoxp roperties of both system.…”
Section: Electrochemical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%