Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of crystalline
solids, show promise for application as heterogeneous catalysts. Applying
MOFs in industrial settings usually requires that unprocessed MOF
powder be immobilized within a continuous phase, such as a polymer;
however, it is unknown in general if this immobilization impacts MOF
catalyst behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to directly compare
unprocessed MOF powders and MOF-polymer composites as catalysts. Herein,
we study the biomedically important release of nitric oxide (NO) from
endogenous S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) catalyzed
by the unprocessed powder and polymer composite forms of H3[(Cu4Cl)3(BTTri)8] (CuBTTri). The
NO release system is especially appropriate as CuBTTri has found real-world
application in the field of biomedical materials. The results show,
in this system, that the rate of NO generation changes when a CuBTTri
polymer composite is the catalyst as opposed to the unprocessed MOF
powder. Hence, findings for MOF powder catalysts may not always translate
to MOF-polymer composites.