“…These modified approaches include a cross-cut twisted tape with an alternate axis (CCTA) with a Cu/Water nanofluid as the working fluid [8,9], twin co-twisted tapes and twin counter-twisted tapes (CoTs and CTs) with a graphene-platinum nanofluid as the working fluid [10], overlapped dual twisted tapes (O-Dts) with a TiO2/Water nanofluid as the working fluid [11], helical twisted tape with an Al 2 O 3 / water nanofluid as the working fluid [12], twisted tape with dimples and protrusions with an Al 2 O 3 /Water nanofluid as the working fluid [13], dual co-twisted tapes and dual counter-twisted tapes (D-Co-TTs and D-C-TTs) with an Al 2 O 3 /Water nanofluid as the working fluid [14], rectangular-cut-on-its-rib twisted tape with four types of nanofluids as working fluids (TiO 2 /Water, BeO/Water, ZnO/Water, and CuO/Water) [15], twisted tapes with various progression ratios (RGPR and IGPR) with an Al 2 O 3 /Water nanofluid as the working fluid [16], spiky twisted tape with three types of nanofluids as the working fluid (Cu/Water, Fe/Water, and Ag/Water) [17], and trapezoidally cut twisted tape with an Fe 3 O 4 /Water nanofluid as the working fluid [18]. The simultaneous use of these two passive methods increased η by a factor 1.2-1.5 for Re between 4000-10,000 compared to classic twisted tape with water as the working fluid.…”