2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction heat treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
522
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 716 publications
(550 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
23
522
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the d(−ln(1 − EQE))/dE versus E plot for Cu/ [Cd+Sn] = 0.80 with the data extracted from currently published record Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 , [42] Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 , [3] and Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 [43] based devices ( Figure S13a, Supporting Information) shows that Cu 2 CdSnS 4 has smaller bandgap fluctuations than the record devices. Furthermore, comparing the corresponding data from various publications ( Figure S13b,c, Supporting Information), [3,7,9,[42][43][44] which include high-efficiency devices for Ag-, Cd-, Ge-, and Ba-alloyed absorbers, only Ba-alloyed absorbers have smaller bandgap fluctuations than Cu 2 CdSnS 4 ( Figure S13c, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Bandgap and Bandgap Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of the d(−ln(1 − EQE))/dE versus E plot for Cu/ [Cd+Sn] = 0.80 with the data extracted from currently published record Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 , [42] Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 , [3] and Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 [43] based devices ( Figure S13a, Supporting Information) shows that Cu 2 CdSnS 4 has smaller bandgap fluctuations than the record devices. Furthermore, comparing the corresponding data from various publications ( Figure S13b,c, Supporting Information), [3,7,9,[42][43][44] which include high-efficiency devices for Ag-, Cd-, Ge-, and Ba-alloyed absorbers, only Ba-alloyed absorbers have smaller bandgap fluctuations than Cu 2 CdSnS 4 ( Figure S13c, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Bandgap and Bandgap Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[12] This might also be one of the reasons for the decreasing trend in the J SC /J SC,SQ values for the record kesterite devices with increasing S/Se ratio: the 11.6% Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 , [43] 12.6% Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 , [3] and 11.01% Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 [42] devices achieved J SC /J SC,SQ equal to 84.2%, 81.6%, and 74.9%, respectively. Hence, further improvements in the J SC for Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 should focus on the improvement of minority carrier lifetime.…”
Section: Current-voltage Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The highest laboratory efficiencies, 22.6 and 22.1%, have been reported for CIGS and CdTe solar cells, respectively. Recently, a Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (CZTS) cell with a laboratory efficiency reaching 11.1% has been reported . Because of the complexity of the components and the difficult process control of CIGS and CZTS, many efforts have been directed toward finding low‐cost materials that used earth‐abundant and environmentally friendly elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kesterite Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (CZTS) semiconductor has drawn considerable attention as an active light absorber layer for thin‐film solar cells since it possesses a number of unique properties: i) all the compositional elements are earth‐abundant and non‐toxic; ii) it has a direct bandgap (≈1.5 eV) that is close to the optimal bandgap for single‐junction solar cells according to the Shockley–Queisser limit; iii) it has a large light absorption coefficients (>10 4 cm −1 ); and iv) it has similar electronic structures and optical properties to Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGS), which has demonstrated a light‐to‐electricity power conversion efficiency (PCE) of over 22% . Despite the above advantages, the reported best PCE of pure CZTS thin‐film solar cells has just reached ≈11%, far below the theoretical limit and the commercialization requirement. The achieved PCE by co‐evaporation/sulfurization process is even lower (8.4%) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%